create implication raised_fist -> clenched_hand
Fist is aliased to clenched_hand.
Why if I may ask since I thought tags should be as short as possible.
So shouldn't the existing alias the other way round: clenched hand to fist?
Posted under Tags
create implication raised_fist -> clenched_hand
Fist is aliased to clenched_hand.
Why if I may ask since I thought tags should be as short as possible.
So shouldn't the existing alias the other way round: clenched hand to fist?
-1, for the reasons explained in topic #7688 and topic #7721.
If a character has two hands clenched but only one hand raised, as in post #1612234, it should be tagged clenched hands, not clenched hand. The plural doesn't imply the singular.
iridescent_slime said:
-1, for the reasons explained in topic #7688 and topic #7721.
If a character has two hands clenched but only one hand raised, as in post #1612234, it should be tagged clenched hands, not clenched hand. The plural doesn't imply the singular.
iridescent_slime said:
-1, for the reasons explained in topic #7688 and topic #7721.
If a character has two hands clenched but only one hand raised, as in post #1612234, it should be tagged clenched hands, not clenched hand. The plural doesn't imply the singular.
good.
And now the second question :3?
And why don't we make an alias from plural to singular? It's been one by quite some tags.
Logically, we'd have to do the same for tags like hands on hips, hands in pockets, hands on own cheeks, hands on own chest, hands on another's chest, arms behind back, arms up, legs up, knees up, et cetera ad nauseam.
It appears that there is some value to distinguishing between singular and plural with regard to poses. Aliases like these have been considered before in topic #8117 and they usually get shot down: forum #47224 forum #63818
iridescent_slime said:
Logically, we'd have to do the same for tags like hands on hips, hands in pockets, hands on own cheeks, hands on own chest, hands on another's chest, arms behind back, arms up, legs up, knees up, et cetera ad nauseam.
It appears that there is some value to distinguishing between singular and plural with regard to poses. Aliases like these have been considered before in topic #8117 and they usually get shot down: forum #47224 forum #63818
Does make sense indeed and that would cause a big mess and reduces precise tagging. Ok, convinced.
But the question about aliasing clenched hand to fist (and its plural) is still left. What about this one or is it more common in english language to use clenched hand?
Provence said:
But the question about aliasing clenched hand to fist (and its plural) is still left. What about this one or is it more common in english language to use clenched hand?
I have no idea why fist is aliased to clenched hand and not the other way around. Either way is fine to me, and "fist" appears in a number of other tags: fist bump, fist pump, palm-fist greeting, and so on.
iridescent_slime said:
I have no idea why fist is aliased to clenched hand and not the other way around. Either way is fine to me, and "fist" appears in a number of other tags: fist bump, fist pump, palm-fist greeting, and so on.
Ok, I make one request but there is a problem because I can't do that:
That's how it looks like
unalias fist -> clenched_hand
unalias fists -> clenched_hands
alias clenched_hand -> fist
alias clenched_hands -> fist
Any idea where the error is? Because I get an error message but it says exactly the same as the request does.