Interspecies/Bestiality for Pokemon

I've recently had bestiality added to a few explicit posts involving pokemon (creature) that I considered between humanoids (examples: post #3958662 post #3950094), so I'd like to gather a consensus on how these should be tagged. How humanoid does a species have to be to qualify for interspecies rather than bestiality? Should all Pokemon be tagged bestiality given they are technically creatures and the bestiality wiki mentions this? For example, as human-like as Mr. Mime is, he still treated like a pet and eats out of a food bowl.

There canonically exists a Human-Like egg group which could be used to quality for interspecies, but some of these, such as Toxicroak, Beheeyem, and Grapploct, I would question being given that qualification. Even a Pokemon like Hypno which is often tagged interspecies over bestiality (although not always) is based somewhat on a tapir. What about Mawile? In post #3964009 its extra mouth is performing an oral act while its human-like owner is not; interspecies or bestiality?

If you have bestiality blacklisted, what kind of posts do you not want to see? Where do you draw the line?

As a related side-note, should any Pokemon disqualify the no humans tag from being used? For example, post #2517802.

I, for one, have always seen bestiality as an act done between a rational being and a another acting merely off of pure instincts. Mawile in the post you sent seems to understand that what she's doing is lewd, and feels bad about it, but I don't think the same can be said of actual dogs.