Posted under Tags
BUR #3272 has been rejected.
create implication holding_stuffed_animal -> holding_stuffed_toy
stuffed_animal implicates stuffed_toy, so their holding tags should implicate it too.
EDIT: The bulk update request #3272 (forum #171384) has been rejected by @evazion.
Updated by a moderator
Is this tag really needed?
holding_stuffed_toy -holding_stuffed_animal returns 110 results while holding_stuffed_animal has 2904 posts. holding_stuffed_toy stuffed_animal should be enough to find the current holding_stuffed_animal (currently, it is not so we would need a mass update).
As I said in topic #17009 where this was previously proposed, holding stuffed animal should be aliased to holding stuffed toy. Stuffed toy is a superset of stuffed animal and frankly stuffed animal should be aliased to stuffed toy, they're virtually the same tag.
The bulk update request #3272 (forum #171384) has been rejected by @evazion.
BUR #3427 has been approved by @evazion.
remove implication holding_stuffed_animal -> stuffed_animal
create alias holding_stuffed_animal -> holding_stuffed_toy
create implication holding_stuffed_toy -> stuffed_toy
As above. Having both holding stuffed animal and holding stuffed toy is redundant because most stuffed toys are stuffed animals. Compare this to holding cellphone, which is aliased to holding phone because most phones are cellphones.
EDIT: The bulk update request #3427 (forum #172512) has been approved by @evazion.
Updated by a moderator
The bulk update request #3427 (forum #172512) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #3434 has been approved by @evazion.
remove implication holding_stuffed_animal -> holding
Remove leftover holding implication from holding stuffed animal.
EDIT: The bulk update request #3434 (forum #172588) has been approved by @evazion.
Updated by a moderator
The bulk update request #3434 (forum #172588) has been approved by @evazion.
