BUR #4539 has been approved by @evazion.
remove alias ear_bow -> ear_ribbon
We differentiate bows and ribbons everywhere else, this shouldn't be an exception.
Was made in topic #12790.
Posted under Tags
BUR #4539 has been approved by @evazion.
remove alias ear_bow -> ear_ribbon
We differentiate bows and ribbons everywhere else, this shouldn't be an exception.
Was made in topic #12790.
NWF_Renim said:
Is there any real value in differentiating this? Do we have any examples of any of these bows not made from a ribbon? I feel like we'd have almost 100% overlap.
post #4327388, post #4167142, post #3043169 all show only the bow part.
nonamethanks said:
post #4327388, post #4167142, post #3043169 all show only the bow part.
I guess I get it, just seems odd to not tag the bow out of the thing it's literally made of.
If it should be aliased at all it should be ear_ribbon -> ear_bow because the bow is the prominent feature and what it is made out of doesn't matter in most cases.
Or maybe not because there are a few pictures of ear ribbons that aren't tied in a bow (post #3749339, post #3632864, post #1653123, post #3187235 and post #1573334).
Updated by Nameless Contributor
NWF_Renim said:
Is there any real value in differentiating this? Do we have any examples of any of these bows not made from a ribbon? I feel like we'd have almost 100% overlap.
Well, it's no worse than differentiating between hair ribbon and hair bow. When I skim through hair ribbon I see a lot of posts, probably the majority, that are actually hair bows. The fact that hair ribbon is massively mistagged and nobody cares enough to fix it makes me very skeptical that the distinction matters at all.
The bulk update request #4539 (forum #179693) has been approved by @evazion.