imply between_toes > toes

Posted under Tags

nonamethanks said:

What about post #4444509?

In that case it's not between_toes since that 1 pixel there is white between the fish and the foot.
Also you can still see the toe, but if you want to say that if lowres toes are not qualified, then yes, it's a contradiction.

nonamethanks said:

There's also things like post #3107626 or post #2985185. There's few posts under toes tabi and they mostly appear to be for visible toes through the fabric or for a single bare foot, not for cases like these two posts.

Yeah, they do indicate that there are toes although I wouldn't want to find a character wearing tabi when searching for toes,
and the wiki for toes is not clear about whether it can be visible naked toes or if they can be under clothing either.
By the current definition it can be everything that has a resemblance to a toe.

Updated by pronebone

1