BUR #6661 has been rejected.
create implication between_toes -> toes
For something to be visually between toes, there has to be visible toes.
Also consistency with between_breasts and between_pectorals
Posted under Tags
BUR #6661 has been rejected.
create implication between_toes -> toes
For something to be visually between toes, there has to be visible toes.
Also consistency with between_breasts and between_pectorals
BUR #6662 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication greek_toe -> toes
create implication spread_toes -> toes
Also there are these two that focuses on the toes and tagged quiet tamely from what I can see by a quick skim through.
pronebone said:
BUR #6661 has been rejected.
create implication between_toes -> toes
For something to be visually between toes, there has to be visible toes.
What about post #4444509?
nonamethanks said:
What about post #4444509?
In that case it's not between_toes since that 1 pixel there is white between the fish and the foot.
Also you can still see the toe, but if you want to say that if lowres toes are not qualified, then yes, it's a contradiction.
There's also things like post #3107626 or post #2985185. There's few posts under toes tabi and they mostly appear to be for visible toes through the fabric or for a single bare foot, not for cases like these two posts.
nonamethanks said:
There's also things like post #3107626 or post #2985185. There's few posts under toes tabi and they mostly appear to be for visible toes through the fabric or for a single bare foot, not for cases like these two posts.
Yeah, they do indicate that there are toes although I wouldn't want to find a character wearing tabi when searching for toes,
and the wiki for toes is not clear about whether it can be visible naked toes or if they can be under clothing either.
By the current definition it can be everything that has a resemblance to a toe.
Updated by pronebone
The bulk update request #6662 (forum #193834) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #6661 (forum #193833) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
