Unbreakable said:
For the record, I only added the tag because I reverted all changes made by the sock.
Ah. I see. My apologies, I didn't know. Just wanted to double check before doing anything.
Posted under General
Unbreakable said:
For the record, I only added the tag because I reverted all changes made by the sock.
Ah. I see. My apologies, I didn't know. Just wanted to double check before doing anything.
post #9119741
blue user added the ai-generated tag
Missingno2024 said:
post #9119741
blue user added the ai-generated tag
Went ahead and removed it. Random blue members sometimes add this tag to posts as part of a vandalism effort, and this attempt seems no different. Unless there's any actual proof, I'm just gonna assume this is one such attempt.
Missingno2024 said:
post #9119741
blue user added the ai-generated tag
last year's works of this artist look like AI to me, colors at least post #6826363 look at these hands bruh
post #9120624. Feels modified from an AI drawing. Like some touch ups to hide the prompt itself.
post #9123675 The other works from the source appear to be AI, but I'm not familiar with detecting AI usage in animation.
post #9123370 This artist's works have begun to feel kind of AI-ish for a couple years now- if not, then some sort of editing shenanigans taking place (Besides those tattoos, which look copy-pasted already). I want to believe they aren't using AI though 
Marlor said:
last year's works of this artist look like AI to me, colors at least post #6826363 look at these hands bruh
I'm starting to think you and eromelon just believe everything is AI. But anyways, if you believe all of these artists are AI prompters, why don't you go flag them, with all the evidence you've given here in this thread?
Updated by AYYYYYYMD
AYYYYYYMD said:
I'm starting to think you and eromelon just believe everything is AI. But anyways, if you believe all of these artists are AI prompters, why don't you go flag them, with all the evidence you've given here in this thread?
Actually, I didn't reply to some replies here these days because I don't think there is enough evidence to show some referred posts are AI.
I am writing here because I think some people would be curious about why people think some posts are AI. And I am just sharing my opinion.
I am not interested in convincing anyone or forcing anyone to accept they are AI when they don't know the reason. That's your choice to believe it or not. So I would rather explain the reason instead of simply adding a tag.
By the way, I believe bungeiman_masa is using AI.
post #9115793 confusing color for the edge of lapel, wierd pink stuff on the right side of the jacket
post #9056340 extra finger
Updated by eromelon
eromelon said:
Actually, I didn't reply to some replies here these days because I don't think there is enough evidence to show some referred posts are AI.
I am writing here because I think some people would be curious about why people think some posts are AI. And I am just sharing my opinion.
I am not interested in convincing anyone or forcing anyone to accept they are AI when they don't know the reason. That's your choice to believe it or not. So I would rather explain the reason instead of simply adding a tag.By the way, I believe bungeiman_masa is using AI.
post #9115793 confusing color for the edge of lapel, wierd pink stuff on the right side of the jacket
post #9056340 extra finger
https://danbooru.donmai.us/media_assets/25455515 That "weird pink stuff" is also in the lineart. So I don't know, maybe it's also AI gen, I'm not good at telling AI gen linework. The finger count thing is weird, but that kind of anatomical error has existed since before AI, so I don't know what else to say. If you're really serious, flag it, I'm sure the approvers know better than you and I. It really doesn't cost anything to do it.
Also, he posts a lot of roughs on Twitter. Example: https://twitter.com/bungeiman_masa/status/1907807270177747290#m
Updated by AYYYYYYMD
AYYYYYYMD said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/media_assets/25455515 That "weird pink stuff" is also in the lineart. So I don't know, maybe it's also AI gen, I'm not good at telling AI gen linework. The finger count thing is weird, but that kind of anatomical error has existed since before AI, so I don't know what else to say. If you're really serious, flag it, I'm sure the approvers know better than you and I. It really doesn't cost anything to do it.
Also, he posts a lot of roughs on Twitter. Example: https://twitter.com/bungeiman_masa/status/1907807270177747290#m
Well, I believe I have said "I am not interested in convincing anyone or forcing anyone to accept they are AI when they don't know the reason."
Also, I believe I have said "[t]hat's your choice to believe it or not."
Perhaps I should have made it clearer: I am just saying why I believe they are AI. You could trust it, deny it, ignore it, delete the image from this website, print the image and hang it in your room, hit the "artist" with a baseball bat, or support them on patreon or some other websites. It doesn't matter to me.
By the way, I assumed you should know that it is easy to copy AI works and make some roughs. It turns out I did make some mistakes.
eromelon said:
Well, I believe I have said "I am not interested in convincing anyone or forcing anyone to accept they are AI when they don't know the reason."
Also, I believe I have said "[t]hat's your choice to believe it or not."
Perhaps I should have made it clearer: I am just saying why I believe they are AI. You could trust it, deny it, ignore it, delete the image from this website, print the image and hang it in your room, hit the "artist" with a baseball bat, or support them on patreon or some other websites. It doesn't matter to me.
By the way, I assumed you should know that it is easy to copy AI works and make some roughs. It turns out I did make some mistakes.
Well, if you see signs of AI in the three different sketches and roughs he did for that one work alone, let me know. I genuinely would be curious to see what exactly I should be looking for. Good day.
AYYYYYYMD said:
Well, if you see signs of AI in the three different sketches and roughs he did for that one work alone, let me know. I genuinely would be curious to see what exactly I should be looking for. Good day.
So now I learn that I have to make "You could" "deny it" "It doesn't matter to me" bold next time. Thank you.
eromelon said:
So now I learn that I have to make "You could" "deny it" "It doesn't matter to me" bold next time. Thank you.
> casually accuses an artist of using AI
> uses nothingburger evidence
> gets hit with counter-evidence
> tries to leave while saying "i don't care, actually"
You know, you don't have to accuse anyone if all you have is a hunch.
hasu_no_kougeki said:
> casually accuses an artist of using AI
> uses nothingburger evidence
> gets hit with counter-evidence
> tries to leave while saying "i don't care, actually"You know, you don't have to accuse anyone if all you have is a hunch.
So now I learn one more fact: araizumi_rui is not famous enough among some friends.
post #6300289 looks like AI. However, the artist posted two other images in similar art style on Twitter with videos to show the layers of those two images. I guess that's enough for some friends to believe all three images were drawn by their hands.
https://x.com/araizumirui/status/1690378747722276864
https://x.com/araizumirui/status/1691176628075085824
https://x.com/araizumirui/status/1690569209510825984
https://x.com/araizumirui/status/1691181106538909696
However, post #6300289 was still tagged as AI-generated. And the poor guy in the comments got 7 downvotes for saying it was not AI-generated. I guess this guy was just unlucky, because we DO have enough evidence to show that is not AI-generated.
wang_ze_ji_bu_er_hua
The artist used to tag their uploads as AI-generated on Pixiv up until early 2024 with pixiv #114542055 (NSFW) being their latest upload with the AI-generated tag. Their uploads after that are a bit sus, pixiv #116679348 (NSFW) has inconsistent lineart and hair ornament style. Would like a second opinion on this.
baconmeh2 said:
post #9123675 The other works from the source appear to be AI, but I'm not familiar with detecting AI usage in animation.
Not AI imo. More like sprites and that stretching effect people sometimes use on still images to make them in to animations. The kind of thing you see on porn ads.
baconmeh2 said:
post #9120624. Feels modified from an AI drawing. Like some touch ups to hide the prompt itself.
This one I think is more believable. Fingernails blending into eachother like that is something I've seen in SD. Small teeth blurring together and losing form. Resolution is also suggestive of slightly cropped SDXL or 2x upscale. Possibly the slightly odd shape of the thighs too but that's a weaker signal.
Oh yeah, and the tiny blobby cruciforms to the left in the background.
Updated by CrossbowArcanePlus
Thoughts on archapxl? AI-Assisted? Cleaned up AI pixel art? They only started posting art in Oct 24 and have a relatively inconsistent artstyle. To me the higher detail pieces they put out are a dead ringer for ai gen lighting styles, particularly the way they render hair (see https://x.com/archapxl/status/1895112935481188362, for example, or any of the other vtuber art on their twitter) and the latex rendering in post #8649522.
More damning is that they almost never draw hands the the same way and often fuck up the number of fingers:
post #8989891 (the tail continuity is also a little weird in this one)
post #8957820
They recently posted a process gif but it only shows in steps and there's very little "exploration" in the process which makes it seem fake to me. Most artists change things as they develop a piece, even if not dramatically.
thesilvercavalier said:
Thoughts on archapxl? AI-Assisted? Cleaned up AI pixel art? They only started posting art in Oct 24 and have a relatively inconsistent artstyle. To me the higher detail pieces they put out are a dead ringer for ai gen lighting styles, particularly the way they render hair (see https://x.com/archapxl/status/1895112935481188362, for example, or any of the other vtuber art on their twitter) and the latex rendering in post #8649522.
More damning is that they almost never draw hands the the same way and often fuck up the number of fingers:
post #8989891 (the tail continuity is also a little weird in this one)
post #8957820They recently posted a process gif but it only shows in steps and there's very little "exploration" in the process which makes it seem fake to me. Most artists change things as they develop a piece, even if not dramatically.
In post #8908991, it's hard to imagine how the strap of the shoulder bag should be placed, too.
But people would believe they are simply not good at understanding the pose. I guess we should just be tolerant.
Updated by eromelon
post #7715980 and post #8381102
both previously had the ai-assisted tag, worth looking over again
post #9135182 The source contains ai-generated works, but they have work from pre-ai, and appear to be a 3d modeler?