Implicating school_swimsuit -> one-piece.
Reason: As far as I know a school swimsuit is always a one-piece swimsuit.
Updated by DschingisKhan
Posted under General
Implicating school_swimsuit -> one-piece.
Reason: As far as I know a school swimsuit is always a one-piece swimsuit.
Updated by DschingisKhan
jxh2154 said:
Hmm, I was about to do this but it would pretty much completely swamp the one-piece tag. 5900 to 300.
Well, currently there are a ton of one-piece swimsuits that aren't tagged. I was hoping that this implication would raise awareness of the tag so that people start using it. If all one-pieces were properly tagged then I don't think the one-piece tag would be swamped with just school swimsuits.
I think regardless of proper tagging they would be swamped with the school_swimsuits. It's just simply the most common, and probably most popular, one-piece style we'll be seeing in the hosted artwork
Anyways no real opinion on the implication, as of right now. I do wonder though if there couldn't possibly be a case buried somewhere of a "modified" or just stylized like a school swimsuit that is a two piece.
swimsuit -bikini would likely yield the same desired result as growing the one-piece tag as suggested, as well as being more accurate since the use of bikini is probably near universal. One-piece is probably better used for swimwear such as post #468784 that is neither school_swimsuit or competition_swimsuit.
Updated
Lokispawn said:
swimsuit+ -bikini would likely yield the same desired result as growing the one-piece tag as suggested, as well as being more accurate since the use of bikini is probably near universal. One-piece is probably better used for swimwear such as post #468784 that is neither school_swimsuit or competition_swimsuit.
I just tried this, actually, and have noted a couple related things that I'd like other opinions on.
You currently need to exclude sling_bikini too, because it implies swimsuit but not bikini. That one seems a little odd, IMO; should that link be added?
The other thing that gave me pause was whether bikini_top should imply bikini.
Thoughts?
DschingisKhan said:
The other thing that gave me pause was whether bikini_top should imply bikini.
bikini should be used when an entire bikini is showing, bikini top when you can only see someone's upper half or yoko's gear. Otherwise you may as well do the implication the other way around and destroy the bikini_top tag.
Updated
No vote on whether the one-piece tag should exist, but if it does, I think the implication should be made. School swimsuits are one piece swimsuits, so they should get included in the tag. And if you didn't want to seem them, you could do a search for one-piece -school_swimsuit.
Lokispawn said:
swimsuit -bikini
The problem with this search is that it excludes pictures where one girl is wearing a bikini and another girl is wearing a one-piece (post #477630).
The one-piece tag should exist because there's no search that can adequately replace it.
Log said:
Logic about swimwear!
Makes sense, okay.
As for the original topic point, evazion and kumarei seem to have it: a school_swimsuit certainly is a one-piece and swimsuit -bikini doesn't account for 2girls or more. Like post #376107.
Your points are valid. Perhaps a casual_swimsuit tag is needed then for swimwear that isn't for school or competition, all implicating towards one-piece?
Lokispawn said:
Your points are valid. Perhaps a casual_swimsuit tag is needed then for swimwear that isn't for school or competition, all implicating towards one-piece?
Not really a need. If it's not for school or competition, it's presumably casual, no?