Posted under Tags
BUR #18082 has been rejected.
create alias object_in_panties -> object_in_clothes
create alias object_in_swimsuit -> object_in_clothes
Since there's really not much reason to keep those tags separate. Disregard, I was being stupid.
Updated by Insanity Demon
Damian0358 said:
Why did you nuke both tags before making this BUR? The BUR would have done that for you if it went through.
Because I noticed that there were a few banned posts that I couldn't change the tags on, and I wanted to try and force it through on them.
Which, now that I think about it, is a kinda stupid reason to make a BUR, so I guess it's not a big deal if this one falls through.
Don't nuke tags that have been around for years without discussing it first. Even if, in this case, you're the one who created them.
Updated by Obst
Alright, understood. Give me some time to go back and un-nuke them. Done.
Updated by Insanity Demon
The bulk update request #18082 (forum #246768) has been rejected by @Insanity_Demon.
BUR #18198 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication object_in_panties -> object_in_clothes
create implication object_in_swimsuit -> object_in_clothes
Yeah, this is what I should have done from the start.
The bulk update request #18198 (forum #247261) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
I just want to note that vibrator under clothes has 3k posts, ten times as many posts as object in clothes. Probably makes sense at this point to exclude sex toys from the latter tag.
