Implication for lipstick ring

create implication lipstick_ring -> lipstick_mark_on_penis

The implication was not made when the latter was created.

BUR #23311 has been rejected.

create implication lipstick_ring -> lipstick_mark_on_penis

You have to format it like this, use the word "imply" beforehand, not "create implication". It gets automatically changed to that after it's posted.

They're not quite for the same thing, though. Lipstick ring is for a band of lipstick over the perimeter, caused by putting a dick in one's mouth; lipstick mark is for a lip-shaped mark simply on the surface, caused by kissing it flatly.

There's at least one case where lipstick_ring seems to have been used for a dildo. Should it still apply, or is it a mistag since the wiki only specifies a lipstick ring around a penis? Is there a tag for a lipstick ring or mark on an object?
post #5863994

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #23311 (forum #268865) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.