imply holding_watermelon -> holding_fruit

BUR #24609 has been rejected.

create implication holding_watermelon -> holding_fruit
create implication holding_watermelon -> watermelon

Self-explanatory.

Edit: Added imply holding_watermelon -> watermelon

Why not imply holding as well?

War6t2 said:
Why not imply holding as well?

Holding fruit has already implied holding food -> holding.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This seems to be a break from convention. Any reason why we shouldn't just use holding fruit + watermelon like we do with holding apple, holding peach, etc.?

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #24609 (forum #274001) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.