BUR #26692 has been rejected.
create implication kai_no_kiseki -> eiyuu_densetsu
Can anyone please add the implication for the latest upcoming iteration of the franchise?
Posted under Tags
BUR #26692 has been rejected.
create implication kai_no_kiseki -> eiyuu_densetsu
Can anyone please add the implication for the latest upcoming iteration of the franchise?
Kuro no Kiseki II implicates kuro no kiseki, and this is supposedly the third game in this subseries. Do we need kuro no kiseki (series)?
Yes, the Kiseki series' sub-arcs implications have been a mess for years. I'll layout 4 BURs that should be done already (I'll start doing them tonight or tomorrow)
I should at least also point out Hajimari no Kiseki is a unique game that acts as some grand conclusion to the Crossbell duology and Sen no Kiseki I-IV but since implying two tags isn't a thing I think it's fine to just leave it as is (i.e. only implying Eiyuu Densetsu). idk what other Kiseki fans here might think though
Updated
BUR #26934 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
remove implication sen_no_kiseki_ii -> sen_no_kiseki
remove implication sen_no_kiseki_iii -> sen_no_kiseki
remove implication sen_no_kiseki_iv -> sen_no_kiseki
see: first bullet in my post above
there's no sen no kiseki ii, iii or iv posts that don't have sen no kiseki 1 on them. so the only mass update needed is through sen no kiseki 1
BUR #26937 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
remove implication kuro_no_kiseki_ii -> kuro_no_kiseki
see: second bullet in post above
You don't really need those lines of mass updates because the implications cover that already. Don't forget that whenever a series that previously uses the first installment as the umbrella tag gets an actual umbrella tag, someone needs to go back and either manually remove the first installment from every sequel post that doesn't apply, or request it to be removed from all sequel posts via a BUR, then add it back to the ones that apply.
I don't know the series well enough to know how the sub-series are interlinked, is there any use in having a Kiseki (series) tag?
Pretty much 99% of Eiyuu Densetsu posts are the Kiseki sub series. The earlier Eiyuu Densetsu arcs (Dragon Slayer duology, Gagharv trilogy) have maybe 1/10000th of the popularity and amount of art . If some remake/re-release of those arcs somehow happen and they get a lot more popular (therefore more art) then Kiseki (series) would probably be needed so that one who wants to search for the non-Kiseki games can just do Eiyuu Densetsu -Kiseki_(series)
those non-Kiseki games are in a different universe than Kiseki, though they share some concepts and ideas and are both officially part of the Eiyuu Densetsu franchise anyhow (I really do wish Falcom just considered Kiseki its entirely own franchise though..)
for now a Kiseki (series) feels like it'd just be for clarity sake. which I'm not really opposed to, but I think it can easily be done if & after the above burs are done
Updated
Also if these go through I can remove Sen no Kiseki 1 and Kuro no Kiseki 1 tags from the Sen 2-4 and Kuro 2 posts which they don't apply
c_spl said:
(I really do wish Falcom just considered Kiseki its entirely own franchise though..)
Kondo: The name of the folder under development is still "The Legend of Heroes", but I wonder when ...... will only just become the "Trails" series (laughs).
https://trakev210.wixsite.com/haohansuke21/post/dengeki-online-part-i-nihon-falcom-president-kondo-reveals-a-secret-story-behind-the-trails-serie
they pretty much do already lol
that being said, i dont see much use in differentiating between sky 1-3, since 1 and 2 are basically just part 1 and 2 of the same story and 3 is kinda an extended epilogue / set up for crossbell. havent gotten around to those games or the cold steel yet but pretty much the only changes between sky 1-3 are kevin and ries and introducing the rest of the ouroborus
The bulk update request #26692 (forum #282573) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
BUR #28518 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update sen_no_kiseki (sen_no_kiseki_ii or sen_no_kiseki_iii or sen_no_kiseki_iv) -> -sen_no_kiseki
mass update kuro_no_kiseki kuro_no_kiseki_ii -> -kuro_no_kiseki
create alias sen_no_kiseki -> sen_no_kiseki_i
remove alias sen_no_kiseki -> sen_no_kiseki_i
create alias kuro_no_kiseki -> kuro_no_kiseki_i
remove alias kuro_no_kiseki -> kuro_no_kiseki_i
This is also needed, right?
The bulk update request #26934 (forum #283437) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #28532 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
remove implication sen_no_kiseki_i -> eiyuu_densetsu
create implication sen_no_kiseki_i -> sen_no_kiseki_(series)
create implication sen_no_kiseki_ii -> sen_no_kiseki_(series)
create implication sen_no_kiseki_iii -> sen_no_kiseki_(series)
create implication sen_no_kiseki_iv -> sen_no_kiseki_(series)
create implication sen_no_kiseki_(series) -> eiyuu_densetsu
remove implication kuro_no_kiseki_i -> eiyuu_densetsu
create implication kuro_no_kiseki_i -> kuro_no_kiseki_(series)
create implication kuro_no_kiseki_ii -> kuro_no_kiseki_(series)
create implication kai_no_kiseki -> kuro_no_kiseki_(series)
create implication kuro_no_kiseki_(series) -> eiyuu_densetsu
Had to split these BURs due to validation errors
The bulk update request #26937 (forum #283442) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #28518 (forum #292887) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #28532 (forum #292945) has been approved by @nonamethanks.