BUR #27852 has been rejected.
create alias sitting_on_car -> on_vehicle
Redundant tag. On vehicle already covers characters sitting on a car.
Posted under Tags
BUR #27852 has been rejected.
create alias sitting_on_car -> on_vehicle
Redundant tag. On vehicle already covers characters sitting on a car.
how about like this:
imply sitting_on_car -> on_vehicle
Like this post #7051466, she is standing on the car
BUR #27891 has been rejected.
create implication sitting_on_car -> sitting
create implication sitting_on_car -> car
create alias sitting_on_car -> on_vehicle
fixed
Is it just me, or is there a process/trend of eliminating tag tuples?
Is this BUR part of the process/trend, or is it supposed to be judged by its own, that is, whether sitting_on_car is a useful tag or indeed redundant as Ourobouro stated?
BUR #27892 has been rejected.
mass update sitting_on_car -> -sitting_on_car on_vehicle sitting
deprecate sitting_on_car
on_vehicle is also for lying or standing on vehicle, aliasing sitting_on_car to it won't do.
GranAutismo said:
BUR #27892 has been rejected.
mass update sitting_on_car -> -sitting_on_car on_vehicle sitting
deprecate sitting_on_caron_vehicle is also for lying or standing on vehicle, aliasing sitting_on_car to it won't do.
Actually, the question amounts to this:
Should we choose sitting_on_car or sitting on_vehicle to retrieve a person sitting on a car.
however, if we choose the latter, this may result in those who do not have a Gold account not being able to retrieve it as conveniently as they could before (it will takes up two tag slots)
A fair point. On vehicle is overly broad covering various postures on a vehicle and various kinds of vehicles, thus to narrow it down to a specific type of vehicle and a specific posture means the usage of 3 tag searches.
The on vehicle tag is a double variable tag requiring two additional tags for any specifics, which really means the tag is too broad in concept and either needs to be split up or it needs subtags to support it. Of note, the vehicle tag doesn't exist because it's too broad to be useful.
Updated
reg_panda said:
I don't understand, why my BUR got so many downs, when it is the same as the original BUR with a lot of ups, minus the mass mistagging?
Making a BUR with both implications and an alias from the same tag is problematic, I dont think it would work at all. Further more some of the images are dubious as to whether they should be tagged with car.
Now that I've thought about it, on_vehicle indeed seems a little too ambiguous. I think we should bring back on_car and alias sitting_on_car to that instead.
Yeah, on_vehicle (motorcycle or bicycle) is completely different from sitting_on_car, it doesn't make sense to have an umbrella tag for these.
BUR #28485 has been rejected.
remove alias on_car -> on_vehicle
mass update sitting_on_car -> sitting on_car -sitting_on_car
mass update on_vehicle car -on_motorcycle -on_scooter -> on_car
deprecate sitting_on_car
forum #290901, might be edited of needed.
The bulk update request #27852 (forum #286866) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #27891 (forum #287015) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #27892 (forum #287020) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.