BUR #35512 has been rejected.
create implication collaboration_request -> artist_request
It is a type of artist request.
Posted under Tags
BUR #35512 has been rejected.
create implication collaboration_request -> artist_request
It is a type of artist request.
BUR #35513 has been rejected.
create implication collaboration_request -> artist_collaboration
Self-explanatory. Separated because I know some people dislike seeing implied tags show up twice in the tag listing, though this already happens for some metatags like key visual.
Don't agree personally - artist request seems sufficient enough to ask for one or more artists that contributed to an image. This seems like bloat and prone to mistags, particularly in the realm of non-artist collaborations (e.g. two copyrights having a "collaboration"). A relevant change was to the collaboration tag itself becoming artist collaboration in topic #27759. Something I initially felt meh about but see why the distinction was necessary.
BUR #35567 has been approved by @evazion.
deprecate collaboration_request
Aight, bet. ETA: Removed the nuke and mass update, just sticking to deprecation
Updated
I agree with it in principle but is it safe to commit this? I'm just thinking about the possibility of collaboration request being mistagged for non-artist requests. Seems manually gardenable to make sure every post under the tag is using it correctly: only 196 posts.
An afterthought to my original post but just as a reference about the use of artist request, think character request. We keep that tag on a post when not all characters have been identified or need to be checked if they're correct. Likewise, that's the intention of artist request - and then virtually every other request tag.
The above is primarily why I feel another implication under artist request isn't necessary since the request tag still on a post should highlight that not all artists have been identified.
The bulk update request #35567 (forum #330851) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #35513 (forum #330604) has been rejected by @evazion.
The bulk update request #35512 (forum #330603) has been rejected by @evazion.
Artist request + artist collaboration is sufficient. I struggle to see how you even know something is a collaboration without knowing both artists. Usually if an artist says something is a collaboration they say who it's a collaboration with.
*_request tags are a plague, people keep coming up with increasingly specific requests that never get filled.
Ylimegirl said:
BUR #35513 has been rejected.
create implication collaboration_request -> artist_collaboration
Self-explanatory. Separated because I know some people dislike seeing implied tags show up twice in the tag listing, though this already happens for some metatags like key visual.
Implications like this where a character/copyright/meta tag implies two separate tags should be avoided as much as possible. This usually means we did something wrong with how the tags are defined or organized.