Posted under Tags
BUR #35596 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication two-tone_dress -> dress
create implication argyle_dress -> dress
create implication armored_dress -> dress
create implication glitter_dress -> dress
create implication highleg_dress -> dress
create implication hobble_dress -> long_dress
create implication coat_dress -> dress
create implication mermaid_dress -> long_dress
These are dress types that don't imply dress
Two-tone dress should imply multicolored dress, not dress. This is how other two-tone tags work.
I'm not sure if everything under armored dress and coat dress is dress-like enough to be tagged as dress. Some of it leans closer to coat or armor than dress (see for example La+ Darknesss's outfit).
Mermaid dress and hobble dress should probably imply long dress instead of dress, since they're supposed to be long dresses by definition.
evazion said:
Two-tone dress should imply multicolored dress, not dress. This is how other two-tone tags work.
I'm not sure if everything under armored dress and coat dress is dress-like enough to be tagged as dress. Some of it leans closer to coat or armor than dress (see for example La+ Darknesss's outfit).
Mermaid dress and hobble dress should probably imply long dress instead of dress, since they're supposed to be long dresses by definition.
I've updated the implications for two-tone dress, mermaid dress, and hobble dress as you suggested.
For armored dress and coat dress, if tagged clothing isn't "dress-like" enough to be considered a dress, then wouldn't those arguably be mistags?
On second thought, I'm going to leave out two-tone dress -> multicolored dress since multicolored clothes is deprecated now and implying two-tone dress might pollute multicolored dress too much. It would take it from 10k posts to 30k posts. I don't want to imply it now then later have to deprecate multicolored dress for being too polluted.
For armored dress and coat dress, if tagged clothing isn't "dress-like" enough to be considered a dress, then wouldn't those arguably be mistags?
I guess. I just see a lot under armored_dress ai:dress,0% and coat_dress ai:dress,0% that leans much more towards armor or coat than dress.
The bulk update request #35596 (forum #330987) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #40989 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication high-low_dress -> dress
create implication asymmetrical_dress -> dress
create implication gold_dress -> dress
create implication puffy_dress -> dress
create implication floral_print_dress -> print_dress
More types of dresses.
The bulk update request #40989 (forum #352977) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
