BUR #39957 has been rejected.
create implication >o< -> >_<
create implication >o< -> :o
If tag "xd" implies ":D" and ">_<" (or x3 implies ":3" and ">_<"), then this tag also needs to be split into two implications.
Posted under Tags
BUR #39957 has been rejected.
create implication >o< -> >_<
create implication >o< -> :o
If tag "xd" implies ":D" and ">_<" (or x3 implies ":3" and ">_<"), then this tag also needs to be split into two implications.
BUR #39961 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
deprecate >o<
mass update >o< -> ->o< >_< :o
Of all the tandem tags out there, the emoticons are the ones I hate the most. What's next, XP? >x<? XT? XV? >.<? Xq? X<? There are endless combinations for these godforsaken tags; we should not be encouraging them.
The bulk update request #39957 (forum #347196) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #39961 (forum #347240) has been approved by @nonamethanks.