multicolored_penis classification

Hi, I am currently sifting through the tag colored_penis, and a portion of the images that are tagged with this tag have a penis with more than 1 observable color, which is why I created the multicolored_penis tag, the wiki is just a simple one to go by for now but I will edit it later once I have enough information.

However the conundrum here is there are 2 kinds of multicolored penises, ones that are about half-half in terms the colors such as post #9226624 where the penis is black about 40% of the way then it is green for the rest, including the glans. There is also post #6601945 where half of it is pink and the rest up to the glans is blue.

The other group is slightly different, the penis is majorly one color while the glans is a different color just like in post #8723263 where the penis is just like the skin tone but the glans are blue, post #9648747 is similar as well although there is still color slightly below the glans. There are less of these kinds of posts but they still exist.

In my opinion I was thinking of including both in multicolored_penis since that still applies, but would like some opinions.

for the sake of consistency between our colored_* tags, i would take some inspiration from the way multicolored skin does it:

At least one of the skin colors has to be unnatural and the colors have to be visually distinct from each other.

meaning post #8723263 is just a colored penis, post #9226624 is multicolored, and so on.

wingdings said:

for the sake of consistency between our colored_* tags, i would take some inspiration from the way multicolored skin does it:

meaning post #8723263 is just a colored penis, post #9226624 is multicolored, and so on.

Good idea, that would probably be the better way of doing it.

However what do you think for post #9648747? Would that be just colored_penis or multicolored_penis?

I feel like neither post #9648747 nor post #9226624 are multicolored.
The skin color of the body matches that of the penis, so I think it's 'normal' for the genitals to be blue/black. I'd tag both with just colored, not multicolored. Kind of how humans have normal skin on the penis, but also a different colored glans, which makes me question the colored tag's usefulness.
post #9648747 has a little bit of a gradient thing going, so that could maybe warrant a multicolored tag, but I think the difference in color is barely noticeable, so I'm unsure.

personally, i would add an extra clause like "the penis must have at least two distinct colors that are not shared by the skin surrounding it". under that definition, the post you linked would not apply.

there's not really any precedent to go off of with multicolored appendages, none that i can tell anyway, so that clause could be a bad idea, but that's my gut feeling.

I see, I guess that is a more accurate way of doing it, appreciate it.