Are naked_shirt et al. applicable when the character isn't shown to be bottomless?

Naked shirt is currently being applied to posts in which the character is not explicitly depicted as bottomless, usually because the shirt is long enough to cover the character's lower torso and upper thighs, and there is no way to tell.

Examples:

• post #8697029
• post #3270776

The same situation can be found in naked jacket, naked overalls, etc. but to a lesser degree, because posts in these tags tend to be more explicit.

Should we apply naked shirt when the character is not explicitly wearing nothing else? I think it would be helpful to make up our mind and specify it in the Wiki.

My personal take is we should use no pants if we are not actually seeing that the character is bottomless.

8253803 said:

Naked shirt is currently being applied to posts in which the character is not explicitly depicted as bottomless, usually because the shirt is long enough to cover the character's lower torso and upper thighs, and there is no way to tell.

Examples:

• post #8697029
• post #3270776

The same situation can be found in naked jacket, naked overalls, etc. but to a lesser degree, because posts in these tags tend to be more explicit.

Should we apply naked shirt when the character is not explicitly wearing nothing else? I think it would be helpful to make up our mind and specify it in the Wiki.

My personal take is we should use no pants if we are not actually seeing that the character is bottomless.

i think nearly naked shirt was supposed to handle this but the wiki says (deleted) in it so idk

Definitely still applies; I'd just tag what you see. You can't see any other clothes, so it appears it's a naked shirt. There are too many oversized shirt examples anyway; the shirt is typically closed and long enough that you cannot tell if panties are worn.

If you want confirmation the character is totally naked, just add tags like groin, pussy peek, open clothes, etc.