BUR #51263 has been rejected.
create implication joker:_folie_a_deux -> joker_(2019)
Technically the sequel as much as I don't like it lol
Updated by Space Force Detective
Posted under Tags
BUR #51263 has been rejected.
create implication joker:_folie_a_deux -> joker_(2019)
Technically the sequel as much as I don't like it lol
Updated by Space Force Detective
The bulk update request #51263 (forum #400692) has been rejected by @evazion.
BUR #51281 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication joker:_folie_a_deux -> batman_(series)
The wider series it is a part of.
Space_Force_Detective said:
BUR #51281 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication joker:_folie_a_deux -> batman_(series)
The wider series it is a part of.
This BUR is unnecessary if you're creating an implication to Joker (2019), which already implicates Batman_(series)
uzheng said:
This BUR is unnecessary if you're creating an implication to Joker (2019), which already implicates Batman_(series)
The previous BUR has been rejected.
aster1a said:
The previous BUR has been rejected.
Yes I made the new BUR after the first one was rejected (I'm slightly confused as sequels are typically implied from what I've seen, especially for a large series like this with a bunch of different canons/subseries, but I digress)
Space_Force_Detective said:
Yes I made the new BUR after the first one was rejected (I'm slightly confused as sequels are typically implied from what I've seen, especially for a large series like this with a bunch of different canons/subseries, but I digress)
For example Fate/EXTRA CCC implies Fate/EXTRA so why wouldn't Joker 2 imply Joker 1?
Same reason why we don't have The Dark Knight imply Batman Begins. Sometimes we have sequels imply the original, but usually it ends up being a bad idea that we have to revert years later when the series grows larger.
The bulk update request #51281 (forum #400793) has been approved by @evazion.