Arcee Implications

BUR #52452 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication arcee_(prime) -> arcee
create implication arcee_(idw) -> arcee
create implication arcee_(earthspark) -> arcee

Different versions of the same character

Space_Force_Detective said:

BUR #52452 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication arcee_(prime) -> arcee
create implication arcee_(idw) -> arcee
create implication arcee_(earthspark) -> arcee

Different versions of the same character

Fuck it, figure I'll ask, as it turns out it seems next to no variants are implied at all and TF tagging is a huge mess, so should they be aliased and it just be judged on the copyright tag or what? I'll start with Arcee here with a BUR for that to see what people think

BUR #52455 has been rejected.

create alias arcee_(prime) -> arcee
create alias arcee_(idw) -> arcee
create alias arcee_(earthspark) -> arcee

As mentioned in the above post I'm not sure if alises or implications should be used, TF character tags need cleaned up BAD regardless.

The bulk update request #52452 (forum #409512) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #52455 (forum #409526) has been rejected by @evazion.