Furisode Girl implications

Posted under Tags

BUR #53127 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication furisode_girl_blossom -> furisode_girl_(pokemon)
create implication furisode_girl_kali -> furisode_girl_(pokemon)
create implication furisode_girl_katherine -> furisode_girl_(pokemon)
create implication furisode_girl_linnea -> furisode_girl_(pokemon)
create implication furisode_girl_(pokemon_legends:_z-a) -> furisode_girl_(pokemon)

For the longest time, the Furisode Girl Trainer class had five tags: one for the class as a whole, and one for each of the four designs seen in X and Y. A few years ago, a BUR was submitted to deprecate the generic tag, with the justification being that the four designs are all visually distinct, meaning the generic tag serves little purpose. While this BUR was ultimately rejected, I did notice this exchange within the thread:

G-SANtos said:

If a tag is deprecated, can it be undeprecated later? Because it's entirely possible a different game brings back the Furisode Girl Trainer class, in which case we would need to be able to use the tag.

Obst said:

It can be, yes. We'd simply need to create another BUR.

With Pokémon Legends: Z-A bringing the Furisode Girl class back, now seems like as good a time as any to turn the generic tag into an umbrella tag.

1