I posted this a while ago and I'm not sure why it got deleted. I don't know why it's off-topic because the is are AV-idol posts and I not sure about the breasts larger than head since I tagged it as bb.
Updated
Posted under General
I posted this a while ago and I'm not sure why it got deleted. I don't know why it's off-topic because the is are AV-idol posts and I not sure about the breasts larger than head since I tagged it as bb.
Updated
Perhaps one of the mods thought it was beyond the line of reason? Not to pick at your fetishes (I'm not really a big big breast fan myself), but sometimes there can be too much of a good thing.
I've seen places in the past that considered grotesquely disproportionate breasts (beyond regular bb) guro or /d/ material, and neither of those are well accepted here. post #163076 is a good example of what I'm talking about, and you can see from its -14 score, it's not well liked.
I'd say some of your postings cross the line. post #157435 of yours, while otherwise well drawn, is rather egregious example. Probably one of the mods decided to delete one of your posts for being too far outside what is accepted as mainstream here.
Again, I don't want to pick at your fetishes, but that's my guess as to what happened.
Fencedude said:
large breasts will never be guro. Ever. I wish people would stop lumping odd fetishes under "guro" just because they don't like them.
I never said *I* considered it guro, only that some places have in the past. And also it sort of makes sense being that "guro" is short for "grotesque" as in "grotesquely disproportionate". I know it's not actually used that way, but you can see how it might be derived.
Shinjidude said:
I never said *I* considered it guro, only that some places have in the past. And also it sort of makes sense being that "guro" is short for "grotesque" as in "grotesquely disproportionate". I know it's not actually used that way, but you can see how it might be derived.
Guro has a very specific meaning, and that is not it. Yes, it is derived from "Grotesque", but that does not mean all things you may consider "grotesque" are guro.
Fencedude said:
Guro has a very specific meaning, and that is not it. Yes, it is derived from "Grotesque", but that does not mean all things you may consider "grotesque" are guro.
Actually, the lumping together is a well-established thing, for one reason or another. All of {gore,freakshow,scat} are commonly referred to as guro, and it's reflected by sites like gurochan. With freakishly huge tits falling under freakshow, obviously.
Now, that doesn't mean our tag usage has to follow that (and I'd be definitely against doing so), but your claims about precise and well-defined meaning of the term are not correct.