Tag suggestion: no_floor

I don't know if this ties into simple_background or even merits a tag, but I thought there should be a tag for when something in the image, be it the subject or something else, is clearly on the floor but no floor was drawn.

For example, post #1100438.

+1

I don't think this tag is really needed. We usually* tag things that are present in the image, not things that are absent from it.

*AFAICS, exceptions were only made for clothing and body details.

I haven't ever heard of, nor picked up on, a rule or pattern like that. However, I'm still not in favour of the tag.

For starters, you're limiting yourself to only images that show the full body. Second, floors are only drawn when the character is being drawn into the scene. Look at any <style>_background full_body search and you'll find a lot of images similar to what you're describing. i.e. clearly interaction with something that wasn't actually drawn into the image.

• post #1139738
• post #1184472
• post #1146665

Instead, I'd be in favour of a tag where the background is not a simple colour, but is also not a scene that the character is drawn into. There would be boarderline cases, but I think there's a tag for that (though I'm always forgetting it's name, "based"?)