Resized to 19% of original (view original)
hakurei reimu, flandre scarlet, cirno, shameimaru aya, fujiwara no mokou, and 14 more (touhou and 1 more) drawn by mofu_mofu

Artist's commentary

  • Original
    •

    夜は始まったばかり。

    フラン「じゃんじゃん持ってきて♪」
    素敵すぎな食生活の霊夢におごってあげるフランちゃん。でも財布なんて持っていない事に気づいて…。
    翌日、食事代＋霊夢へのお土産代＋治療費＋何故か鬼達の呑み代も含めて、レミリア・スカーレット様宛に請求書が届きました。

    東方楽ｺﾐｭ(http://com.nicovideo.jp/community/co1574223)のお絵描き大会へ～。お題は「夜」と候補の「カルテット」「文(ぶん)」「おかわり」を強引に；
    結局ぎりぎりになって雑になっちゃいました…orz　ら、らすとはﾏｽﾞｲﾃﾞｽ。こんなのでｽﾐﾏｾﾝｺﾞﾒﾝﾅｻｲ；　次は１キャラにしよう、そうしよう…。まぁ、そんな事よりおかみすちーかわいい。

  • Comments
  • Recommended
    •
    Mithiwithi
    [hidden]

    Why is this in "No Panties?"? The only character I can see whose panty status is in any way evident is Flandre, and she's clearly naked under the open robe. Is it because Mystia's outfit is tight enough on the butt that you'd expect panty lines?

    0 Reply
    Cliff Edge
    [hidden]

    Mithiwithi said:

    Why is this in "No Panties?"? The only character I can see whose panty status is in any way evident is Flandre, and she's clearly naked under the open robe. Is it because Mystia's outfit is tight enough on the butt that you'd expect panty lines?

    Yep. That's the whole point of the pool:

    This is for images where it's very likely that the character isn't wearing panties, but you can't tell for 100% sure. Of course, this only works when she is wearing an outfit you'd normally expect someone to wear panties with, such as a schoolgirl uniform.

    In this case, it's highly likely, but not 100% certain, that Misty is going regimental.

    0 Reply
    Mithiwithi
    [hidden]

    Cliff_Edge said:

    In this case, it's highly likely, but not 100% certain, that Misty is going regimental.

    I just wasn't sure if Mysti's case was ambiguous enough to count... but then, I guess if I guessed the right person who may or may not be wearing 'em, that's a clear enough sign that they're ambiguous.

    0 Reply