The following may be uploaded, but will be put to a higher level of artistic and qualitative scrutiny than normal, and you absolutely must tag them with the corresponding tag:
Grotesque: Any depiction of extreme mutilation, extreme bodily distension, feces, or bodies that are far outside the realm of normal human proportion (for example, breasts that are larger than three heads in size or penises that are larger than two heads in size).

Penis is about twice as large as the head (if not smaller) and the breasts are within the safe range.

The penis also actually looks longer than it is due to perspective and foreshortening.

If turned upwards it's about as big as post #2246713 but just with less girth and less prominent veins along with giving more accurate scaling due to it being almost perpendicular to the viewer. The girth is also acting to be misleading for it's size as it makes it look larger.

The breasts don't violate the rules, they're within the safe range (like Zelinkokitsune said), and that penis is small in comparision to most of the pictures deleted for similar reasons... In fact If you were to look at a lot of the deleted stuff on this site(excluding those deleted for not being approved in three days), you'd see there are far "worse" pictures on here, as well as there not being many things wrong with this picture.

IDFK_Omega said:

If you were to look at a lot of the deleted stuff on this site(excluding those deleted for not being approved in three days), you'd see there are far "worse" pictures on here, as well as there not being many things wrong with this picture.

The existence of worse images on Danbooru has never been a good excuse for keeping subpar art, yet people continue to trot out the same argument every time one of their favorite drawings gets flagged. If you find images of lower quality than this one, then by all means, feel free to flag them. Just don't use them as a reason for not deleting anything else.

Also, remember that flagging isn't some kind of automatic death sentence. This post wasn't uploaded through the mod queue, so being flagged only means that it's getting put to the same test of quality that non-contributor uploads get. Given that this is borderline grotesque and has some noticeable faults with proportions and shading, it probably shouldn't have skipped the queue in the first place.

I don't know what's wrong with shading (it's standard, nothing spectacular but also nothing wrong), but i just copypasted a part of rules of this site (danbooru.donmai.us) that invalidates this flag. That's all, i don't wanted to start another war, i don't wanted to start some iditic "i saw worse x here" discussion, i just wanted to note that our moderators should read rules, because without this they should not be moderators and should not use "flag" option. That's all.

I guess I just don't see why people would call this "grotesque" but im just saying its not bad, and its doesn't look like most pics ive seen flagged/deleted for being "grotesque".

Ive never seen the point in flagging pics mainly because when I see a something that I may have a problem with, I don't like it, but theres definetly someone else who will, so i'll just leave it be. Meanwhile a lot of other people see something they don't like and want it gone instantly. It just gets annoying seeing things like this flagged over and over again thats all...

Oh, and btw - i chuckled hard sying that she use somebody's bra as a "balls holder".

Oh, and another that can't read rules - read one more time first comment here, read it LOUD. That's all.

Wait this just got resolved and now it's flagged AGAIN? Seems like someone is rather upset this didn't get deleted.

I got a feeling every single possible damn argument to be used to delete this will be used and I think may count as flagging abuse.

Define "Bad Proportions" Is it the tits again? Since most other things look fine. The shading is fine as well. It's a pretty solid shading job. I have to wonder if someone has something against this artist or something.

People will come in here to rules-lawyer every single time a picture with bad proportions gets flagged, but they always fail to notice the part that says that these images will be put to a higher level of artistic and qualitative scrutiny than normal. If you took off the breasts and penis, you'd still be seeing a girl with a malformed body shape and incorrectly attached legs. Hence, flagging this picture for deletion is not, by any definition, abuse.

feline_lump said:

People will come in here to rules-lawyer every single time a picture with bad proportions gets flagged, but they always fail to notice the part that says that these images will be put to a higher level of artistic and qualitative scrutiny than normal. If you took off the breasts and penis, you'd still be seeing a girl with a malformed body shape and incorrectly attached legs. Hence, flagging this picture for deletion is not, by any definition, abuse.

So I should just flag all of Yohane's art because it's broken body city but it's utterly ignored and blank check approved. Gee I wonder if there is a double standard at play here.

Zelinkokitsune said:

So I should just flag all of Yohane's art because it's broken body city but it's utterly ignored and blank check approved. Gee I wonder if there is a double standard at play here.

If you see any particularly egregious examples, then go ahead. In fact, he's even been flagged and deleted more often than this artist here.

If there's any "double standard", it's the one listed in the rules - that images with grotesque breasts and/or penises are put to higher scrutiny than others. If you feel that's unfair, then perhaps you could put it up for discussion in the forums.