It's a really obvious nude filter. Bra strap shadow, really obvious butt, hair shadow mysteriously disappears, weird highlight where the jewel was before. Shut it down.
The original wouldn't be so bad if not for little things like the jagged shadow and flat clothing, and a floor texture that makes the rest of the image look comparatively bland. It looks like the artist started with a 3d render and tried to cover it up with a bit of photoshop magic, but missed some annoying details.
Nude filter is not be a cause for deletion, but this is not even a good nude filter, it's jagged, discolored, and obvious at a glance. It's honestly somewhat lazily done. The photoshopper could have at least used anti-aliasing. Take a look at the other nude filter posts that remain on the site. For the most part, if you examine the posts without their parent posts, it's only with careful scrutiny that you can tell they've been altered at all. This one you can tell immediately with how flat her butt looks and how rough the lines are around her butt. I don't think any of the other nude filters that remain on this site (save post #592044 but that's been half removed already) should be removed for being nude filters. I think this one should be removed for being a poorly done nude filter. If you compare this post to other deleted nude filter posts, there are several that are of a similar quality. Should we undelete those? We're supposed to hold third party edits to a higher degree of quality than other posts anyway, right?
