Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? akeyama kitsune 637

Copyright

  • ? kantai collection 511k

Character

  • ? kongou (kancolle) 13k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? ahoge 738k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? brown hair 1.7M
  • ? collarbone 882k
  • ? eyebrows 42k
  • ? hair bun 283k
  • ? hands on own stomach 2.0k
  • ? japanese clothes 432k
  • ? large breasts 1.8M
  • ? long hair 4.9M
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? nontraditional miko 32k
  • ? nude 549k
  • ? purple eyes 916k
  • ? sideboob 130k
  • ? single hair bun 77k
  • ? sitting 1.1M
  • ? smile 3.2M
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? stomach 309k
  • ? unworn headgear 330
  • ? white background 1.7M
  • ? yokozuwari 21k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M
  • ? photoshop (medium) 707k

Information

  • ID: 2330875
  • Uploader: zeparoh »
  • Date: about 9 years ago
  • Size: 294 KB .jpg (708x1000) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/56360295 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 4
  • Favorites: 15
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (about 9 years ago)
kongou (kantai collection) drawn by akeyama_kitsune

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 金剛

    長女の風格

    • ‹ prev Search: user:zeparoh status:deleted status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    picnic
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    akeyama_kitsune's C-game at best

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cokerpilot
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    I will never truly understand people who flag post because the Anatomy is not perfect in a picture that is otherwise good or above quality. It's not perfect be few pieces of art here or anywhere else are.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    cokerpilot said:

    I will never truly understand people who flag post because the Anatomy is not perfect in a picture that is otherwise good or above quality. It's not perfect be few pieces of art here or anywhere else are.

    Well..it's part of the picture.
    And perfect is no picture. But here: The left thighs looks like it has been detached to a...joint. So, it's too far awy to the crotch.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cokerpilot
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Markgraf said:

    Well..it's part of the picture.
    And perfect is no picture. But here: The left thighs looks like it has been detached to a...joint. So, it's too far awy to the crotch.

    Well yes but I still don't think that's a good reason for it to be flagged for deletion

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    cokerpilot said:

    Well yes but I still don't think that's a good reason for it to be flagged for deletion

    That's why anyone can flag who think that a picture has severe problems in ones eyes.
    Btw. sorry if my reasoning is not that convincing regarding the picture since my knowledge about anatomic vocabulary in English is very restricted and the right use of it.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cokerpilot
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Markgraf said:

    That's why anyone can flag who think that a picture has severe problems in ones eyes.
    Btw. sorry if my reasoning is not that convincing regarding the picture since my knowledge about anatomic vocabulary in English is very restricted and the right use of it.

    The fact that you are actually stating your reasoning while by polite about is both refreshing and a credit to your personality. I disagree with the need for it be deleted but have no issues with you or your vocabulary sir (or is it miss?). Also I think I came off as a little condensing in my first post and I apologize for that.

    Updated by cokerpilot about 9 years ago

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    cokerpilot said:

    The fact that you are actually stating your reasoning while by polite about is both refreshing and a credit to your personality. I disagree with the need for it be deleted but have no issues with you or vocabulary sir (or is it miss?). Also I think I came off as a little condensing in my first post and I apologize for that.

    Doesn't matter :3. And it's Sir.
    I agree that the rest is fine though. If it wouldn't be for that thigh, I think, it would be one of the artist's best fanarts. It's a little pity.
    But let's see what approvers are thinking.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 368087
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    The more uneasy part of this picture is her epic smug face, rather than that thight. IMHO.

    And about that error with thight - i think it's pretty minor flaw, not worth of deleting.

    Updated by user 368087 about 9 years ago

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /