While the photo itself was taken badly, being a photo in and of itself is not reason to flag, the photo tag exists and is populated with decent photo scans.
While the photo itself was taken badly, being a photo in and of itself is not reason to flag, the photo tag exists and is populated with decent photo scans.
And that is not the reason for flagging. It was flagged, because it apparantly is a BAD photo according to the flagger. That is was flagged because it is a photo is not part of that flag. So it is indeed a quality-only question.
And that is not the reason for flagging. It was flagged, because it apparantly is a BAD photo according to the flagger. That is was flagged because it is a photo is not part of that flag. So it is indeed a quality-only question.
The following may be uploaded but are generally not recommended unless a better copy cannot be found:
Poorly compressed: Any image where compression artifacts are easily visible. An exception to this is if the image was uploaded by the artist and there are no higher quality versions available.
I believe that we can treat it like that - we have no better version of this picture available. Flag is unnecessary.
And that is not the reason for flagging. It was flagged, because it apparantly is a BAD photo according to the flagger. That is was flagged because it is a photo is not part of that flag. So it is indeed a quality-only question.
