That tiny break in the middle... annoys me so much.
I had to double check if my script was working correctly but it is. Other online preview readers have the same exact thing; stitch is off by a few pixels.
That tiny break in the middle... annoys me so much.
I had to double check if my script was working correctly but it is. Other online preview readers have the same exact thing; stitch is off by a few pixels.
Fairly certain it is intentional, the same way people on pixiv and other sites upload terribly aliased images, to discourage rehosting.
Fairly certain it is intentional, the same way people on pixiv and other sites upload terribly aliased images, to discourage rehosting.
shrug Ah well...
I'm about 80% sure though that post #2549491 and post #2549492 are from actual purchases themselves (whether it is from BW, BL, EBJ, etc.), which explains why they're pretty much alias/artifact-free as far as I can see... The 20% is my hunch that maybe they did some photoshop with it, or it's that the second reading sample is just hands down better than the first one, which I can tell right off the bat at least for this series.
post #2659799 is a native rip, but it's hard to tell the difference between that and yours (post #2650572) unless you compare it by layer directly. So sometimes it's decent, othertimes it gets pretty blehh.
