Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? tamaki nozomu 106

Copyright

  • ? dance in the vampire bund 131

Character

  • ? mina tepes 125

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? barefoot 408k
  • ? black panties 149k
  • ? bow 1.3M
  • ? flat chest 192k
  • ? lowleg 17k
  • ? lowleg panties 7.4k
  • ? panties 697k
  • ? pink hair 792k
  • ? rapier 5.7k
  • ? red eyes 1.4M
  • ? side-tie panties 43k
  • ? solo 5.5M
  • ? sword 303k
  • ? topless female 77k
  • ? twintails 996k
  • ? underwear 857k
  • ? underwear only 70k
  • ? weapon 658k

Meta

  • ? photoshop (medium) 707k

Information

  • ID: 270455
  • Uploader: dragnfly »
  • Date: about 17 years ago
  • Approver: Mug-G »
  • Size: 362 KB .jpg (600x848) »
  • Source: blog.goo.ne.jp/tamakiya_web »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 33
  • Favorites: 85
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
This post has 0 children (learn more) « hide
post #270455
mina tepes (dance in the vampire bund) drawn by tamaki_nozomu
  • ‹ prev Search: user:dragnfly next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    dragnfly
    about 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    That's the last one for now. I'm wondering if Mina should get the Loli tag instead of just flat chest. She's small enough that a teenager's hand can cover her entire ass.

    There's an H doujin from c73 of it (姫様と朝) by the author which can be found pretty much anywhere, so somebody else can upload that if they want. My personal rules prevent me from uploading hdoujin pages.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    [deleted]
    about 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    [deleted]

    Deleted by Henduluin over 9 years ago

    葉月
    about 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    Which still has no place here, it's not a child version of a known character. Not to mention she doesn't even look childish, just being physically small is irrelevant.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    bluishwolf
    about 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    葉月 said:
    Which still has no place here, it's not a child version of a known character. Not to mention she doesn't even look childish, just being physically small is irrelevant.

    You're confusing "child" with "young."

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    memegui
    about 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    I removed the "or suggestive" part from the child wiki since the whole point of the tag was to include images that aren't loli. On another note, this image is technically Safe, the breasts and genitals are covered, so it's just as safe as any other swimsuit pic, this doesn't change based on the age of a character. The fact that it's sexually suggestive or not is open to interpretation.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /