Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? hinata sora 257

Copyrights

  • ? fate (series) 354k
  • ? ↳ fate/grand order 263k

Characters

  • ? artoria pendragon (fate) 41k
  • ? ↳ mysterious heroine x alter (fate) 1.6k
  • ? ↳ mysterious heroine x alter (second ascension) (fate) 396

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? :/ 13k
  • ? ahoge 742k
  • ? ass 655k
  • ? bad anatomy 16k
  • ? bike shorts 54k
  • ? black-framed eyewear 43k
  • ? blonde hair 1.7M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? closed mouth 1.4M
  • ? cowboy shot 645k
  • ? cross calibur (fate) 297
  • ? from behind 263k
  • ? glasses 407k
  • ? gym uniform 35k
  • ? hair between eyes 1.3M
  • ? holding 1.6M
  • ? holding sword 130k
  • ? holding weapon 310k
  • ? jacket 1.1M
  • ? long sleeves 1.8M
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? looking back 307k
  • ? medium breasts 981k
  • ? name tag 21k
  • ? open clothes 572k
  • ? open jacket 284k
  • ? semi-rimless eyewear 51k
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? sword 304k
  • ? twisted torso 8.5k
  • ? v-shaped eyebrows 203k
  • ? weapon 662k
  • ? yellow eyes 795k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M

Information

  • ID: 2782795
  • Uploader: Sacriven »
  • Date: about 8 years ago
  • Size: 107 KB .jpg (689x849) »
  • Source: twitter.com/soramoti00/status/830748446084657152 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 11
  • Favorites: 36
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (almost 8 years ago)
artoria pendragon and mysterious heroine x alter (fate and 1 more) drawn by hinata_sora

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • ヒロインXオルタちゃん。スパッツ衣装が一番好みです(´∀`)

    • ‹ prev Search: user:Sacriven status:deleted status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Squishy
    almost 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    @flagger

    When it comes to the Tits & Ass pose, you may want to go into more detail, and take into account if the overall quality of the image has been far too negatively impacted despite other merits of the illustration.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    ceres
    almost 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Squishy said:

    @flagger

    When it comes to the Tits & Ass pose, you may want to go into more detail, and take into account if the overall quality of the image has been far too negatively impacted despite other merits of the illustration.

    As the flagger, I'm not obligated to go into detail, because it's obvious what's wrong at this. The anatomy is garbage and the pose just looks flat out stupid.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NWSiaCB
    almost 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Squishy said:

    @flagger

    When it comes to the Tits & Ass pose, you may want to go into more detail, and take into account if the overall quality of the image has been far too negatively impacted despite other merits of the illustration.

    As not-the-flagger, it doesn't so much look like she's twisting her torso so much as her upper torso is just sitting on top of a shelf somewhere behind some disconnected lower half of someone a foot closer to the camera.

    This is also decent quality, but not of such astoundingly good quality that it begs people to forgive all flaws.

    The "Tits and Ass Pose" is also a term of mockery for a reason, it's a lazy way to try to bank on a larger variety of fetishes without really caring about the anatomy. It's not like Danbooru has any shortage of well-drawn tits or ass-centric images, so let the spotlight shine on the ones where the artist thought the anatomy through before drawing tits and ass first, then figured out how to connect them as an afterthought.

    6 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Squishy
    almost 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    wuv_u said:

    As the flagger, I'm not obligated to go into detail, because it's obvious what's wrong at this. The anatomy is garbage and the pose just looks flat out stupid.

    Question is if that alone is enough to have the image deleted?

    Everything else about is pretty good. I'd say that's enough to give it a pass despite the 'garbage' anatomy due to the 'stupid' pose.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    ceres
    almost 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Squishy said:

    Question is if that alone is enough to have the image deleted?

    Everything else about is pretty good. I'd say that's enough to give it a pass despite the 'garbage' anatomy due to the 'stupid' pose.

    In fact, it is enough to have the image deleted. The quality is decent, but the anatomy is just so horrifyingly bad that it's near impossible to forgive. It looks like the upper and lower parts of the body were drawn separately and then edited into the same drawing.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Squishy
    almost 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    wuv_u said:

    In fact, it is enough to have the image deleted. The quality is decent, but the anatomy is just so horrifyingly bad that it's near impossible to forgive. It looks like the upper and lower parts of the body were drawn separately and then edited into the same drawing.

    That was the clarification I was looking for, thanks!

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cokerpilot
    almost 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Why pray tell are you people down voting Squishy when all he is doing is asking for clarification.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /