Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? mogg 87

Copyright

  • ? original 1.3M

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? blonde hair 1.7M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? medium breasts 977k
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? nipples 916k
  • ? nude 550k
  • ? solo 5.6M

Meta

  • ? highres 6.1M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 2.1M
  • ? photoshop (medium) 707k
  • ? third-party edit 25k

Information

  • ID: 299050
  • Uploader: Sabhantas »
  • Date: almost 17 years ago
  • Size: 353 KB .jpg (1544x2580) »
  • Source:
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 1
  • Favorites: 1
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

user edit (almost 17 years ago)
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #299049
Resized to 55% of original (view original)
original drawn by mogg
  • ‹ prev Search: user:Sabhantas status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Sabhantas
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    This time she's slimmer :-)

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    homeless homo
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    Why did you do that?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    hytone
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    Because the original was a fatty, amirite?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Sabhantas
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    I just wanted to make her a bit slimmer. Is it something I am to blame for?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    MD Anonymous
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    Yes.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Sabhantas
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    Why?

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    homeless homo
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    Pretty much, we want original work here by the original artist. We don't want a user to tweak an image to his liking and post it.

    Also, you screwed up on the clouds.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Sabhantas
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    Kayako, you may as well guess that tastes differ and what seems thin to your taste may look fit-looking but rather corpulent in someone else's. The same applies to your view of the actual human proportions. They all are different with every person.

    Homeless homo, it's your personal right not to like modified pix. But tell me where it's written in the site's rules not to post them.

    For originals, there's a special tag.

    You could as well ask every member of danbooru whether they like them or not, before saying 'WE don't want'. So guess who's screwed up.

    And, where did you see clouds in the pix? The green ones? :-)

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    homeless homo
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    Sabhantas said:

    For originals, there's a special tag.

    Your use of original (in this discussion) is totally wrong.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    hytone
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    so you're saying the original was "corpulent"? wow.

    you can chalk me up as a member of Danbooru who would rather see art by the original artist, as opposed to useless edits by people who can't see clouds, thanks.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cnmanx
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    im sure he is referring to the lightish blue cloud on the left side of the picture, which got jagged/dented due to the shifting of the image. depending on your monitor contrast settings, you might not be able to directly see it at a glance though.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    スラッシュ
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    As much as I agree that this edit is lame, there IS a tag for it. Considering all the fucking awful nude filter images on danbooru, I don't see why this one is any different.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    スラッシュ
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    (The tag being "photoshop" by the way.)

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Dr Fine Rolo
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    homeless_homo said:
    Your use of original (in this discussion) is totally wrong.

    Surely he meant parent:

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Sabhantas
    almost 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    hytone said:
    so you're saying the original was "corpulent"? wow.

    you can chalk me up as a member of Danbooru who would rather see art by the original artist, as opposed to useless edits by people who can't see clouds, thanks.

    You CAN see the original, I posted it prior to the edit, so I don't see a problem with it.
    And, yes, this edit is lame, I was too lazy to spend much time on it. But did I claim it to be perfect? You personally may not like it, but why delete it? Let other people see it and compare it with the original and make their own judgements if they will.
    Otherwise, you'd have to delete more than half of the pix posted here, as there are many of them which may be disliked by different individuals for this or that reason. Then, where will freedom of expression and creation will be?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /