Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? kawahagi-tei 36

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? adjusting hair 23k
  • ? arms up 211k
  • ? blue eyes 2.0M
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? brown hair 1.7M
  • ? gigantic breasts 11k
  • ? lactation 21k
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? mouth hold 87k
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? necktie 511k
  • ? nipples 922k
  • ? skirt 1.7M
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? sweat 596k
  • ? topless female 77k

Meta

  • ? bad id 1.3M
  • ? ↳ bad pixiv id 993k
  • ? copyright request 115k
  • ? highres 6.2M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 2.2M

Information

  • ID: 3529668
  • Uploader: lkjh098 »
  • Date: about 6 years ago
  • Size: 1.06 MB .jpg (2280x2880) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/75037240 »
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 31
  • Favorites: 67
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (about 6 years ago)
Resized to 37% of original (view original)
drawn by kawahagi-tei
  • ‹ prev Search: user:lkjh098 status:deleted status:deleted status:deleted status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    [deleted]
    about 6 years ago
    [hidden]

    [deleted]

    Deleted by Nacha over 1 year ago

    final name
    about 6 years ago
    [hidden]

    It's the arms too, which are poor quality.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Provence
    about 6 years ago
    [hidden]

    Why should I blacklist perfectly fine tags only because one image under this tag is flaggable? Makes no sense.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cokerpilot
    about 6 years ago
    [hidden]

    Lacrimosa said:

    Why should I blacklist perfectly fine tags only because one image under this tag is flaggable? Makes no sense.

    Only one image...

    Just a single glance at the tag and i see tons of pics with arguagly larger more unweildly breasts in them compared to this.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NWSiaCB
    about 6 years ago
    [hidden]

    Remember when the rules excluded breasts two heads large?...

    Well, also that face looks like a Picasso, and the back looks really weird, too...

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Provence
    about 6 years ago
    [hidden]

    cokerpilot said:

    Only one image...

    Just a single glance at the tag and i see tons of pics with arguagly larger more unweildly breasts in them compared to this.

    You mean one active upload that would also attract 8 poor quality marks by the approvers? I really doubt that.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    lkjh098
    about 6 years ago
    [hidden]

    NWSiaCB said:

    Remember when the rules excluded breasts two heads large?...

    Well, also that face looks like a Picasso, and the back looks really weird, too...

    The rules excluded breasts three heads large. 1-2 heads was huge_breasts, and 2-3 heads was gigantic_breasts.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NWSiaCB
    about 6 years ago
    [hidden]

    lkjh098 said:

    The rules excluded breasts three heads large. 1-2 heads was huge_breasts, and 2-3 heads was gigantic_breasts.

    Back a few years ago, the rules excluded breasts 2 heads large. When someone flagged a post for breaking that ratio that one of the admins liked, the rules suddenly changed to three heads.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Nipply
    about 6 years ago
    [hidden]

    NWSiaCB said:

    Back a few years ago, the rules excluded breasts 2 heads large. When someone flagged a post for breaking that ratio that one of the admins liked, the rules suddenly changed to three heads.

    That's some selective memory.

    2009: Rules exclude breasts as large as the body.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20090208203139/https://danbooru.donmai.us/static/terms_of_service

    2010: Rules exclude 2+ heads.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20101123120935/https://danbooru.donmai.us/static/terms_of_service

    2011: Rules exclude 3+ heads.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20110901205648/https://danbooru.donmai.us/static/terms_of_service

    IMO the rules should never have changed from "as large as the body", if for no other reason then because it's actually enforceable instead of causing silly heads debates.

    And anyways, for example, there are probably way more people who find futanari repulsive than people who are repulsed by oversized breasts (that in this case don't even reach the navel!) I've never really understood why one should have a blanket ban but not the other.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NWSiaCB
    about 6 years ago
    [hidden]

    Nipply said:

    That's some selective memory.

    2009: Rules exclude breasts as large as the body.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20090208203139/https://danbooru.donmai.us/static/terms_of_service

    2010: Rules exclude 2+ heads.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20101123120935/https://danbooru.donmai.us/static/terms_of_service

    2011: Rules exclude 3+ heads.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20110901205648/https://danbooru.donmai.us/static/terms_of_service

    IMO the rules should never have changed from "as large as the body", if for no other reason then because it's actually enforceable instead of causing silly heads debates.

    And anyways, for example, there are probably way more people who find futanari repulsive than people who are repulsed by oversized breasts (that in this case don't even reach the navel!) I've never really understood why one should have a blanket ban but not the other.

    Or in other words, it's true.

    The thing about ludicrously huge breasts is that unless it's done entirely as a gag, then the sort of people who draw without the slightest regard for realism in breasts tends to draw without realism for the rest of the body. The rules were absurd early on, and I have a distrust of someone changing the rules literally just to win an argument, since that doesn't make a good foundation for future arbitration.

    As far as futanari goes, I wouldn't know without looking it up, but I'd suspect there are more people who actively search it out than would look for ludicrously huge breasts, since that's the other aspect that has to be considered - how many people are looking for it as opposed to people are upset by it. This is why, say, guro tends to be on thin ice, since few people look for it but there are plenty of people seriously distraught by it.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /