Women will swear that he was a woman eventually anyway, or create a new female christ figure and demand it be added to the bible soon enough, they did it to star wars.
Women will swear that he was a woman eventually anyway, or create a new female christ figure and demand it be added to the bible soon enough, they did it to star wars.
I won’t deny that the drawing is well done, but it crosses into iconoclasm. It takes the sacred image of Christ and reshapes it into something that misrepresents who He is—turning Him into a sensual or lustful figure. I’m not assuming this was your intent, but regardless of intention, the result is deeply disrespectful. As a Christian, I believe images of Jesus should reflect His holiness, not distort His nature.
I realize this is an old post, and I’m commenting late, but the fact that it’s still up suggests a lack of care for how sacred images are treated. That’s why I felt compelled to speak up now.
