Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? mon (manarestra) 60

Copyright

  • ? azur lane 138k

Characters

  • ? pola (azur lane) 579
  • ? ↳ pola (seaside coincidence) (azur lane) 305

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? 2boys 353k
  • ? :>= 5.9k
  • ? after fellatio 6.2k
  • ? afterimage 13k
  • ? ahegao 22k
  • ? bar censor 175k
  • ? bikini 558k
  • ? bikini pull 9.6k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? censored 512k
  • ? clothes pull 88k
  • ? cum 274k
  • ? cum in mouth 32k
  • ? cum string 9.7k
  • ? dutch angle 131k
  • ? fellatio 75k
  • ? female pubic hair 97k
  • ? greyscale 550k
  • ? hand up 409k
  • ? heart 672k
  • ? heart-shaped pupils 97k
  • ? hetero 607k
  • ? huge breasts 246k
  • ? long hair 4.9M
  • ? monochrome 691k
  • ? multiple boys 536k
  • ? multiple penises 21k
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? nipples 917k
  • ? official alternate costume 401k
  • ? oral 91k
  • ? penis 462k
  • ? plump 36k
  • ? pubic hair 151k
  • ? pubic hair peek 6.8k
  • ? shiny skin 134k
  • ? sidelocks 710k
  • ? solo focus 397k
  • ? stray pubic hair 4.3k
  • ? swimsuit 732k
  • ? symbol-shaped pupils 187k
  • ? testicles 102k
  • ? tongue 431k
  • ? tongue out 319k
  • ? topless female 77k
  • ? twintails 1.0M
  • ? v 175k

Meta

  • ? commentary 1.7M
  • ? ↳ symbol-only commentary 134k
  • ? highres 6.1M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 2.1M

Information

  • ID: 4567681
  • Uploader: dean exia »
  • Date: about 4 years ago
  • Size: 3.36 MB .jpg (2894x4093) »
  • Source: twitter.com/MaNaResTra/status/1401175377846751243 »
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 91
  • Favorites: 133
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 29% of original (view original)
pola (azur lane) drawn by mon_(manarestra)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 🍖

    • ‹ prev Search: cum_string next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Jimmani20
    about 4 years ago
    [hidden]

    Next time please tag pictures correctly , this should have been in my blacklist but it wasn't

    -7 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    anhdunghisinh
    about 4 years ago
    [hidden]

    Jimmani20 said:

    Next time please tag pictures correctly , this should have been in my blacklist but it wasn't

    Why people downvote this comment? The author of this post has responsiblity to tag the post correctly as much as possible, this is how wiki page works.

    -11 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Jerseyboy95
    about 4 years ago
    [hidden]

    Some of them freaky Pasta girls will try and suck your soul out if you're not careful. I had something of an experience.

    Updated by Jerseyboy95 almost 4 years ago

    -2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NNescio
    about 4 years ago
    [hidden]

    Jimmani20 said:

    Next time please tag pictures correctly , this should have been in my blacklist but it wasn't

    anhdunghisinh said:

    Why people downvote this comment? The author of this post has responsiblity to tag the post correctly as much as possible, this is how wiki page works.

    Because the original uploader already tagged the whole thing pretty much to Level 3 with 43 tags. It was already more than enough a good job.

    Complaining someone missed, what, multiple penises? Not every people remember that kind of tag unless they upload images with, well, multiple cocks on a frequent basis.

    Complaining someone missed 2boys (and by extension multiple_boys)? In hindsight this should have been tagged with those (because of the nature of the work), but for most non-porn posts most people don't bother to count unidentifiable out of frame people. The 'mistake' was perfectly understandable.

    And that's why people downvoted that comment. Original uploader made a good, detailed effort to exhaustively tag most taggable elements in this image, 'missed' just ONE tag (or two if you don't count the implication) that a lot of people would exclude anyway on other posts (if not because of the specific nature of this work), then gets whinged at because of missing that ONE tag. Not to mention said uploader is also a senior user with a long history of contributing to this site.

    Updated by NNescio about 4 years ago

    5 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /