It is not Marine

Score: 82 (and rising)

Dear Lord, have mercy.
Wtf

Provence said:

Score: 82 (and rising)

Dear Lord, have mercy.
Wtf

Sir Mix-a-Lot isn't the only one who likes big butts.

Folks, the anti-ass bias of this site's curation is truly something to behold, as with the repression of CSR in the past. Sad!

bunkhead said:

Sir Mix-a-Lot isn't the only one who likes big butts.

And you other brothers can't deny

LunarHunter said:

Folks, the anti-ass bias of this site's curation is truly something to behold, as with the repression of CSR in the past. Sad!

And most flags actually went through.
Also, CSR improved a lot.

Way too huge ass.

I snorted. And some of y'all see this as an attack.

Too phat for you?

We really delete pics due to too much ass, now?
Too much boobs too, then?

I'd understand bad anatomy, but that was not the flag reason nor does really seem to be the case...

Sigfried666 said:

We really delete pics due to too much ass, now?
Too much boobs too, then?

I'd understand bad anatomy, but that was not the flag reason nor does really seem to be the case...

The flag is very much anatomy-related.

Sigfried666 said:

We really delete pics due to too much ass, now?
Too much boobs too, then?

I'd understand bad anatomy, but that was not the flag reason nor does really seem to be the case...

Yeah absurd breast proportions get deleted too. As they should.

Talulah said:

Yeah absurd breast proportions get deleted too. As they should.

The massive population of the gigantic_breasts tag would like to disagree.

bunkhead said:

The massive population of the gigantic_breasts tag would like to disagree.

Is that an invitation?

Not like a third of that tag is deleted or gets flagged regularly or anything.

Provence said:

The flag is very much anatomy-related.

Should be more like perspective than anything else, really

People on this site really hate asses lmao, Irish people or something? Yet another instance of the most petty 'approval' nonsense on this site I ever saw

I wasn't expecting this to be such a big point of contempt...
I see nothing wrong with this picture.
But I'm not an approver, it falls not to me to approve or delete the pictures on the site.

I like big buts and big busts, so I feel compelled to ask, why are they a content problem now?
Where they always disliked? Are there rules about those kind of uploads?

The artist has over 100 other pieces on the site. I don't get why this one suddenly inspired ire.

Liszt6 said:

The artist has over 100 other pieces on the site. I don't get why this one suddenly inspired ire.

I'm very certain that if flagging happened, very few of this artist's pieces would stay active.

Sigfried666 said:

I wasn't expecting this to be such a big point of contempt...
I see nothing wrong with this picture.
But I'm not an approver, it falls not to me to approve or delete the pictures on the site.

I like big buts and big busts, so I feel compelled to ask, why are they a content problem now?
Where they always disliked? Are there rules about those kind of uploads?

There are rules about anatomy, indeed.

I've heard of a Cleft of Venus, but I didn't expect there to be a goddamn Grand Canyon of Venus, too.

Provence said:

I'm very certain that if flagging happened, very few of this artist's pieces would stay active.

There are rules about anatomy, indeed.

I'm kind curious what your motivation in this is. There's a lot of shite art on this site, but some questionable anatomy that only really hits if you're looking sideways... I ain't sure about that one chief.

LunarHunter said:

Folks, the anti-ass bias of this site's curation is truly something to behold, as with the repression of CSR in the past. Sad!

ass_focus huge_ass status:active: 645 posts
ass_focus huge_ass status:deleted 194 posts

Okay.