Uhh...I think the proportions here are royally fucked.

YOU THINK?! O_o

The only possible explanation is that there are 2 people.

Or she's just really, inhumanly tall.

Her spine muse be completely broken or something, otherwise that's one hell of an error.

The only thing that's really wrong is that the area between her ribs and hips is impossible. Lesson learned: always account for the complete spine.

"and porn" (from the flag comment)
Since when this is a reason to flag something? Rhetorical question of course. This is not a valid reason to flag anything and never was.

That being said, anatomy is really messed up so the flagging itself wasn't all wrong.

Ehm. That could be me. Half of my excuse is that was over two years ago, when rules about flagging was only about to be clarified and giving the reason of flag was not even mandatory (neither visible) so I really didn't care much about writing a good reasoning.
Well, my flag was overrulled, I moved on and forgot about it and then, few days ago I stumbled on this picure again. This time I wrote fully profesional explanation why I think this picture should be deleted, only to see guess-what few seconds later at the top of the screen.

tldr; internet never forgives.

richie said:
the reason of flag was not even mandatory (neither visible)

The visibility of the reason for a flag was only made invisible for a short period of time. I seem to remember a post that was flagged for the following reason: "."