Decent image? And are you trying to justify the Quality with the contents?
The rules talk about quality of art, not content. And pictures have been deleted for bad quality, that looked better than this one. But then again that was an excuse because they didn't like the content. SO lying and double standards.
But, fuck it, I won't bother anymore. Do whatever you want, you want to have double standards? Go ahead.
I will just go back to do focus on good uploads if I find any, and enjoy the pictures around here, you are a waste of my time.
But, fuck it, I won't bother anymore. Do whatever you want, you want to have double standards? Go ahead.
I will just go back to do focus on good uploads if I find any, and enjoy the pictures around here, you are a waste of my time.
You know, this whole thing wouldn't have become nearly as much a flamewar or controversy if you and Wypatroszony had the ability to argue in some manner aside from repeated insults to anyone who disagreed with you.
And yes, I do think that marginal quality art is excusable when something has other redeeming content. The recent "Nitori gets caught in the flow" comic has poor art, but an interesting storyline, Chibi Miku has questionable artwork, especially early on, and sk-ii's convention comics are obviously interesting to some people. Whether this one individually has content enough to justify preventing its deletion is another matter, but I think it's fairly clear that most users do want some content even when the artwork is poor on its own.
