Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? coco (setawar) 105

Copyright

  • ? original 1.3M

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? apron 237k
  • ? bare shoulders 1.1M
  • ? bonnet 12k
  • ? braid 712k
  • ? braided ponytail 36k
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? brown eyes 918k
  • ? brown hair 1.7M
  • ? choker 470k
  • ? cleavage 1.1M
  • ? closed mouth 1.4M
  • ? collarbone 886k
  • ? large breasts 1.8M
  • ? light smile 84k
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? realistic 25k
  • ? simple background 2.1M
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? underwear 861k
  • ? waist apron 56k

Meta

  • ? ai-generated 10k
  • ? commentary request 3.6M
  • ? duplicate 38k
  • ? korean commentary 101k
  • ? stable diffusion 248
  • ? third-party source 50k

Information

  • ID: 5710900
  • Uploader: yyflandre »
  • Date: almost 3 years ago
  • Approver: CoreMack »
  • Size: 97.5 KB .jpg (640x960) »
  • Source: twitter.com/Lin_sAMet/status/1575388798485028865 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 136
  • Favorites: 144
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

third-party dupe (almost 3 years ago)
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #5713542
original drawn by coco_(setawar)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • Ai 개쩔어오

    • ‹ prev Search: duplicate status:deleted next ›
    • « ‹ prev Pool: Serious Beauty next › »
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    CoreMack
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    I didn't notice the ai-generated tag until after I had re-approved this, I probably wouldn't have approved if I had noticed in time.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    raiba
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    No worries. This is one of the finer-looking AI arts

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    rom collector
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    I have yet to prove by myself how far human assisted these things are, but it makes wonder if we are at the beginning for some kind of digital succubus.

    Maybe the (fake or not) time traveler who said we would be governed by some Artificial neural network will be right.

    -4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Nozek
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    rom_collector said:

    I have yet to prove by myself how far human assisted these things are, but it makes wonder if we are at the beginning for some kind of digital succubus.

    Maybe the (fake or not) time traveler who said we would be governed by some Artificial neural network will be right.

    For now, AI is a tool, it doesn't have its own will. It for example synthesizes images based on prompts and what it had learned. Artists create paintings because they want to. AI is more like a camera than a person and invention of the camera did not cause all artists to lose their jobs.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    fallsmeyer
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    Nozek said:

    For now, AI is a tool, it doesn't have its own will. It for example synthesizes images based on prompts and what it had learned. Artists create paintings because they want to. AI is more like a camera than a person and invention of the camera did not cause all artists to lose their jobs.

    Basically this, it's more appropriate to liken it to an automated photoshop using a well trained combination of smudge brushes and layering tools. While this one is pretty good, some even from this artist (and they are an artist on their own) have some more obvious disfunctions as a result of AI not realizing that humans cant' look in two different directions at once (A key failure of AI art right now is that many portrait pieces don't have both of their eyes focusing on the camera even when staring straight at it.)

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 536050
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    Nozek said:

    AI is more like a camera than a person and invention of the camera did not cause all artists to lose their jobs.

    No, but there aren't exactly a ton of people lining up to get their portrait painted these days, either. And the invention of radio and records led to a pretty significant dip in demand for live music performers. Once the kinks are ironed out I wouldn't be surprised if AI-generated art started eating up a lot of the commissioned art market, at the minimum.

    fallsmeyer said:

    (A key failure of AI art right now is that many portrait pieces don't have both of their eyes focusing on the camera even when staring straight at it.)

    I think this picture might be an example of that, is it just me, or is her left eye (from our perspective) pointed a little too far left?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Agemmata
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    A really good use of AI is the lighting and colors. Getting reference photos with the right colors and feel is difficult enough. AI like Midjourney makes this much easier.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /