That is SO not how breasts work. Or are attached to the chest, for that matter.

We should delete many Tony posts because nobody has two left feet. :x

This post was flagged for deletion. Reason: Bewbs don't work that way! Then again how would I know since I never felt some in my life!

There are many, many, many pictures that feature poor anatomy.

Who the fuck flags a post for something like this?

The feature could as well be disabled, I haven't seen
a single reasonable deletion flag yet, only good or at
least normal posts getting pocket vetoed.

EDIT: Okay, old shit (screencaps, duplicates) gets flagged as well, but a reason like "huge futanari" is just immensely stupid (post #601953).

Justy said:
Who the fuck flags a post for something like this?

The feature could as well be disabled, I haven't seen
a single reasonable deletion flag yet, only good or at
least normal posts getting pocket vetoed.

EDIT: Okay, old shit (screencaps, duplicates) gets flagged as well, but a reason like "huge futanari" is just immensely stupid (post #601953).

agreed.

Bapabooiee said:
...And IMO, the flagging of this post was reasonably well-founded.

People who flag a post should be able to take a think and objectively tell, if the post that offends them (601953) or includes an aspect that (according to them) justifies the deletion (601398), would seem the same way to the majority; whether it isn't just a whim - because the post DID get approved, to begin with.

The same thing happened with the Kimeemaru confession and several more posts. Deleting dupes and old posts that don't fit modern standards is fine, but flagging posts like this one seems to me like pointless nitpicking. But that's probably just me.

Justy said:

EDIT: Okay, old shit (screencaps, duplicates) gets flagged as well, but a reason like "huge futanari" is just immensely stupid (post #601953).

Grotesque is against the ToS, so tough luck.

Justy said:
EDIT: Okay, old shit (screencaps, duplicates) gets flagged as well, but a reason like "huge futanari" is just immensely stupid (post #601953).

Thats reasonable compared to what some people consider poorly drawn.

But what defines grotesque. My view of grotesque and yours, are completely different.

FeKa said:
Grotesque is against the ToS, so tough luck.

"Grotesque" is an ambiguous and *very* individual term. If you want to enforce a decision through convenient ToS interpretations, there could as well exist just safe imagery that fits the admins' immediate mood. If you ask me, there are hundreds, if not thousands of images worse than 601953. Apparently, every single one perfectly fine.

Well, let's stop this, it doesn't seem to lead anywhere.