Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Copyrights

  • ? pokemon 305k
  • ? ↳ pokemon bw 16k

Characters

  • ? oshawott 1.9k
  • ? snivy 1.8k
  • ? tepig 1.4k

General

  • ? no humans 170k
  • ? pokemon (creature) 169k
  • ? starter pokemon trio 3.0k

Information

  • ID: 669208
  • Uploader: kirogazen »
  • Date: about 15 years ago
  • Size: 207 KB .png (873x639) »
  • Source:
  • Rating: General
  • Score: 0
  • Favorites: 3
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days (about 15 years ago)
Resized to 97% of original (view original)
oshawott, snivy, and tepig (pokemon and 1 more)
  • ‹ prev Search: user:kirogazen status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • user 150562
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    lolipiece said:
    I dont think fanart is acceptable

    it is most of the time just annoying

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NeverGonnaGive
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    H'h, didn't think the Swoosh as a Grasser.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    TristaK
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Whatthehell.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    maou ashura
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    ........You kidding me right? This is the best they could come up with?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    landstar
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Nothing has been confirmed yet, save for the silhouettes. More than likely these are fake...

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    pikapika212
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    fake, real pics came up in serebii

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 11314
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Got the types right, though.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    rayp
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Kikimaru said:
    Got the types right, though.

    the types were pretty obvious once the names were revealed.

    Now does this need to remain here? There's no more need for speculation really.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NeverGonnaGive
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Hm, I prefer how the Grass- and Water-types look better here.
    http://bulbanews.bulbagarden.net/wiki/File:Corocoro7.jpg

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /