Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? ito noizi 1.5k

Copyright

  • ? flyable heart 157

Characters

  • ? inaba yui 69
  • ? katsuragi shou 17

General

  • ? 1boy 1.6M
  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? ahoge 739k
  • ? back 102k
  • ? bed 116k
  • ? between breasts 53k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? breast smother 2.2k
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? brown hair 1.7M
  • ? censored 511k
  • ? closed eyes 807k
  • ? completely nude 215k
  • ? dutch angle 131k
  • ? face to breasts 2.9k
  • ? flower 699k
  • ? girl on top 72k
  • ? glowing 112k
  • ? hair ornament 1.6M
  • ? hairclip 374k
  • ? happy sex 17k
  • ? hetero 606k
  • ? hug 136k
  • ? mosaic censoring 226k
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? nipples 916k
  • ? nude 550k
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? penis 460k
  • ? pussy 405k
  • ? sex 301k
  • ? short hair 2.5M
  • ? sitting 1.1M
  • ? small breasts 553k
  • ? straddling 78k
  • ? upright straddle 5.8k
  • ? vaginal 220k

Meta

  • ? game cg 84k
  • ? highres 6.1M

Information

  • ID: 747160
  • Uploader: CountPacula »
  • Date: almost 15 years ago
  • Approver: Bloodletter »
  • Size: 334 KB .jpg (1600x1200) »
  • Source:
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 67
  • Favorites: 201
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 53% of original (view original)
inaba yui and katsuragi shou (flyable heart) drawn by ito_noizi
  • ‹ prev Search: user:CountPacula next ›
  • « ‹ prev Pool: Making Love next › »
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    CountPacula
    almost 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    While being quite close to the line, this image is not explicit enough to warrant rating:e.

    Following the guidelines in howto:rate, this seemed to be the applicable section: "Actual intercourse, if portrayed in a restrained and tasteful manner". Nothing is blatantly exposed, and the focus is on the act, and not the explicit anatomical details, hence I believe that rating:q is the appropriate rating.

    -4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    sgcdonmai
    almost 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    CountPacula said:
    While being quite close to the line, this image is not explicit enough to warrant rating:e.

    I disagree. The image may be pleasant and tasteful, but it is still explicit erotica. Both parties' bodies are on full display, with the point of genital insertion being fully exposed (albeit mosaic censored).
    That is most certainly within the guidelines of rating:e.

    6 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /