I am curious if images such as this should have the 1boy tag or some type of tag to denote a disembodied arm/hand. I feel like it is not reflected in the currently available tags. Thoughts?

ramenspazz said:

<Stuff>

The very first of many rules from the Tagging Guideline:

Rule of Thumb:

Tag what you see, not what you know.

In this case, we don't even know who that disembodied hand belongs to. Don't just go and assume that's a male hand, when it could be anything.

Edit: Also, the disembodied_hand tag exists.

AdventZero said:

The very first of many rules from the Tagging Guideline:

Rule of Thumb:

Tag what you see, not what you know.

In this case, we don't even know who that disembodied hand belongs to. Don't just go and assume that's a male hand, when it could be anything.

Edit: Also, the disembodied_hand tag exists.

Thanks, didn't know that tag existed. Appresh.

AdventZero said:

The very first of many rules from the Tagging Guideline:

Rule of Thumb:

Tag what you see, not what you know.

In this case, we don't even know who that disembodied hand belongs to. Don't just go and assume that's a male hand, when it could be anything.

Edit: Also, the disembodied_hand tag exists.

That is obviously intended to be a male's hand, that's why it's shaped and colored just like a generic male hand. It's not an assumption when it's visually identifiable.

blindVigil said:

That is obviously intended to be a male's hand, that's why it's shaped and colored just like a generic male hand. It's not an assumption when it's visually identifiable.

Basically what I was thinking, but wanted a second opinion on it.