I can't say if it is assisted either because this artist is being drawing for a long time (and there bunch of his previous works already) and because he had already had a sketch before or due to how the shades in her eyes were done.
I really don't like users unilaterally tagging stuff with AI-generated without offering any proof that it is actually AI. Without any discussion about it either. Just tag then flag.
Won't say AI, but can state there seems to be something weird going on with her eyebrows and her hair, her left eyelid crease also splits and becomes part of one her bangs, and there is a bit of an inconsistency between the eyelashes for both eyes. I'd say eyelashes tend to be similar style, but in this case the left eyelash is mostly smooth with the one lash sticking out the side while the right eyelash is feathered with a lot more lashes sticking out.
The apron is also confusing since for something that covers the front, the bulk of it seems all to be on her left pushed to the side. The edge of the apron also suggests that the left of the apron is connected to the right side of her back.
This is what I was talking about when I mentioned discussion. Thank you for your feedback.
I'll admit that I'm not as keyed in on what makes an image AI or not, but these kinds of things should be discussed and talked about in the open either as comments on the post itself, or on the forum (for example, topic #22285), which should then link the relevant forum post in a comment when tagging/flagging. Discord does not count, and unilateral actions are absolutely abhorrent.
It's up to the flagger to provide the evidence for why they think something is AI. In this case there are no obvious AI glitches that I can see, and there are work-in-progress sketches. Additionally this is a very long established artist. There are a some odd compositional decisions, and a couple of images on their twitter that look a lot like AI, but even in those cases, I think it's just unfortunately similar coloring. I'm going to overrule these flags unless someone can come up with something better than a hunch.
I honestly think we should start pinging these guys that flag for ai but don't list the reason. If the reason isn't sufficient(e.g flagging because it just "looks" like ai) then that user should get some kind of punishment.
I honestly think we should start pinging these guys that flag for ai but don't list the reason. If the reason isn't sufficient(e.g flagging because it just "looks" like ai) then that user should get some kind of punishment.
I would 100% be for this. I don't spend much time on the forums anymore, but would pop in and add my support if someone pings me on Danbooru (or Discord).
The artist is clearly using AI to render their sketches, which would make this ai-assisted, but I personally wouldn't approve it because it's a complete mess with obvious mistakes left unfixed. The back bow and apron frills are merging with her sleeves. All their recent posts suffer from this to varying degrees.