Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? ehime mikan 41

Copyright

  • ? girls und panzer 68k

Character

  • ? takebe saori 3.9k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.8M
  • ? ass 659k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? clothes lift 230k
  • ? dress 1.5M
  • ? dress lift 36k
  • ? garter straps 93k
  • ? heart 679k
  • ? large breasts 1.8M
  • ? long hair 4.9M
  • ? maid 168k
  • ? maid headdress 165k
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? orange eyes 199k
  • ? orange hair 275k
  • ? panties 703k
  • ? pink panties 52k
  • ? skindentation 132k
  • ? smile 3.3M
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? thighhighs 1.3M
  • ? thighs 651k
  • ? underwear 866k
  • ? white thighhighs 276k

Meta

  • ? ai-assisted 4.4k
  • ? highres 6.2M

Information

  • ID: 7939382
  • Uploader: Barbatos Rex »
  • Date: about 1 year ago
  • Approver: Shinjidude »
  • Size: 244 KB .jpg (1560x2048) »
  • Source: twitter.com/ehime/status/1806684876588077259 »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 27
  • Favorites: 28
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (12 months ago)
Resized to 54% of original (view original)
takebe saori (girls und panzer) drawn by ehime_mikan

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 武部どの〜

    • ‹ prev Search: comm:any status:deleted status:deleted status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Barbatos Rex
    about 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    Is this really AI? The artist has a sketch of this though
    https://x.com/ehime/status/1773663217404838368

    3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    T34-38
    about 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    Barbatos_Rex said:

    Is this really AI? The artist has a sketch of this though
    https://x.com/ehime/status/1773663217404838368

    I can't say if it is assisted either because this artist is being drawing for a long time (and there bunch of his previous works already) and because he had already had a sketch before or due to how the shades in her eyes were done.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    BrokenEagle98
    about 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    I really don't like users unilaterally tagging stuff with AI-generated without offering any proof that it is actually AI. Without any discussion about it either. Just tag then flag.

    For fucks sake... <_<

    5 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    GreyOmega
    about 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    Won't say AI, but can state there seems to be something weird going on with her eyebrows and her hair, her left eyelid crease also splits and becomes part of one her bangs, and there is a bit of an inconsistency between the eyelashes for both eyes. I'd say eyelashes tend to be similar style, but in this case the left eyelash is mostly smooth with the one lash sticking out the side while the right eyelash is feathered with a lot more lashes sticking out.

    The apron is also confusing since for something that covers the front, the bulk of it seems all to be on her left pushed to the side. The edge of the apron also suggests that the left of the apron is connected to the right side of her back.

    Updated by GreyOmega about 1 year ago

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    BrokenEagle98
    about 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    GreyOmega said:

    Won't say AI, but...

    This is what I was talking about when I mentioned discussion. Thank you for your feedback.

    I'll admit that I'm not as keyed in on what makes an image AI or not, but these kinds of things should be discussed and talked about in the open either as comments on the post itself, or on the forum (for example, topic #22285), which should then link the relevant forum post in a comment when tagging/flagging. Discord does not count, and unilateral actions are absolutely abhorrent.

    4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Shinjidude
    about 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    It's up to the flagger to provide the evidence for why they think something is AI. In this case there are no obvious AI glitches that I can see, and there are work-in-progress sketches. Additionally this is a very long established artist. There are a some odd compositional decisions, and a couple of images on their twitter that look a lot like AI, but even in those cases, I think it's just unfortunately similar coloring. I'm going to overrule these flags unless someone can come up with something better than a hunch.

    3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    iori98
    about 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    I honestly think we should start pinging these guys that flag for ai but don't list the reason. If the reason isn't sufficient(e.g flagging because it just "looks" like ai) then that user should get some kind of punishment.

    3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    BrokenEagle98
    about 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    iori98 said:

    I honestly think we should start pinging these guys that flag for ai but don't list the reason. If the reason isn't sufficient(e.g flagging because it just "looks" like ai) then that user should get some kind of punishment.

    I would 100% be for this. I don't spend much time on the forums anymore, but would pop in and add my support if someone pings me on Danbooru (or Discord).

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Diet Soda
    about 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    The artist is clearly using AI to render their sketches, which would make this ai-assisted, but I personally wouldn't approve it because it's a complete mess with obvious mistakes left unfixed. The back bow and apron frills are merging with her sleeves. All their recent posts suffer from this to varying degrees.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /