Am I the only one who feels like this artist's obsession with no_panties distracts too much from the beauty of the rest of the art?

It fits with the rest of the art, not like there's a highly-detailed vagina surrounded by vaguely-detailed image.
Believe it or not, there ARE some girls who don't wear panties/bloomers/lower undergarments.

akashio, if there's a panties it's an incident. Beauty is still beauty with or without panties.

theadonicus said:
Am I the only one who feels like this artist's obsession with no_panties distracts too much from the beauty of the rest of the art?

I hear what you're saying.

I generally love the no_panties pics, but in this case I agree. It's incongruous with the striking landscape, lighting, and so on. Two great tastes that don't taste great together here.

more like "no_panties?" pool than no panties tags since u cannot see her vagina in most of his art