if you drew this yourself, why is there an "ai-generated'' tag in the post?
Because this site checks it very poorly. I wrote this question in support, but did not receive an answer. My only version is that some moderator, from his PROFESSIONAL point of view, decided that it was AI and did not even think about it and hung this tag on all my works, even those that were made in 2020. Reading the rules of this site, I realized that the only way they can understand that this is AI is their subjective view.
Because this site checks it very poorly. I wrote this question in support, but did not receive an answer. My only version is that some moderator, from his PROFESSIONAL point of view, decided that it was AI and did not even think about it and hung this tag on all my works, even those that were made in 2020. Reading the rules of this site, I realized that the only way they can understand that this is AI is their subjective view.
this is definitely AI: wrong hair accessories, hair is melting, bangs are askew off the head and miku's hair is also much shorter. clearly in her brazilian variant, miku has earrings, but in this post she doesn't. besides, the ear anatomy doesn't make sense.
this is definitely AI. wrong hair accessories and miku's hair is also much shorter. clearly in her brazilian variant, miku has earrings. but in this post she doesn't.
Probably because I painted it to my liking. There is a 2nd option where I made her an earring https://x.com/dante_smin/status/1841493964303520220 If I don't do 1-in-1 design like others, then it means that it's AI. Very solid evidence. Maybe her skin tone is lighter or more contrasting than others, and therefore this is also an evidence base. I hope if you are lucky enough to be accused in court and you are punished for the same evidence base, then I will feel what karma is.
lol on the off chance this isn't blatant AI slop (it is) it wouldn't pass quality control anyway.
Anyone with eyes can see the torso is broken.
I have nothing against rejecting a job if it does not suit you in quality. But writing that this is AI and thus muddying the days of work is no longer beautiful.
The teeth are melted together, hair accessories are not consistent, nails are bleeding into shirt, incoherent eyeball light reflection, melting hairline.
Honestly, AI frauds are so laughably visually illiterate when they think this would actually fool anyone.
As I wrote above, it is a VERY PROFESSIONAL opinion. You can look at other works that are of the same quality and think again about your words.
The teeth are melted together, hair accessories are not consistent, nails are bleeding into shirt, incoherent eyeball light reflection, melting hairline.
Honestly, AI frauds are so laughably visually illiterate when they think this would actually fool anyone.
+ in addition to all the above, there is not a single neural network (AI) that would do 4 work options at once: naked, slightly naked and fully clothed, so that the work does not differ from the previous one by 100%. Maybe you know better where to find a neural network that would strip or dress my character without unnecessary artifacts, but I don't know that.
Not sure what you're even trying to say here, and I don't need to double think stuff. It's obviously not human drawn, humans don't draw teeth melting together.
Oh my God, it's just a picture that is colored through gradient maps in Photoshop, and the teeth were even like in anime, I just gave them a little volume with a shadow, and so as not to stand out, I did not make them VERY detailed. Well, you're an EXPERT, you know better.
Yeah no... - The sudden shift in background quality from the image in the link compared to this; this is way worse. - The disappearance of the line going horizontally across the shorts underneath her hand. (also not even present in the other image) - The color of the shorts and the green lining of the shirt being a completely different hue between the images. - Forgetting what an ear looks like in this image. - Stumpy index finger here compared to a more lengthy one in the other image. - No shading for the pocket's deformity caused by fingers being inside it. - Whatever in all of unholy fuck is going on with her breast. there's 3 different contour lines/edges defining the breast's size and shape that are all conflicting with one another: one from the armpit, one from the ribs, and one from the shadow of her shirt.
Taking in what the others have already said about the other image, this much inconsistencies doesn't suit a well experienced artist. This is especially so in a image set where there exists a defined color palette from the first image. But its not all bad; I do believe you at least did in fact draw the beer cans in this image.
Yeah no... - The sudden shift in background quality from the image in the link compared to this; this is way worse. - The disappearance of the line going horizontally across the shorts underneath her hand. (also not even present in the other image) - The color of the shorts and the green lining of the shirt being a completely different hue between the images. - Forgetting what an ear looks like in this image. - Stumpy index finger here compared to a more lengthy one in the other image. - No shading for the pocket's deformity caused by fingers being inside it. - Whatever in all of unholy fuck is going on with her breast. there's 3 different contour lines/edges defining the breast's size and shape that are all conflicting with one another: one from the armpit, one from the ribs, and one from the shadow of her shirt.
Taking in what the others have already said about the other image, this much inconsistencies doesn't suit a well experienced artist. This is especially so in a image set where there exists a defined color palette from the first image. But its not all bad; I do believe you at least did in fact draw the beer cans in this image.
I'm too lazy to answer each point in detail. All this is explained by the human factor and that everyone makes mistakes. You can study other works. https://x.com/dante_smin
I'm thinking you used AI somewhere in the process and painted over it. Your older works don't look AI, but your recent Miku art certainly does. AI or not, they do not fit our quality standards and have little chance of getting approved in the modqueue.
I'm thinking you used AI somewhere in the process and painted over it. Your older works don't look AI, but your recent Miku art certainly does. AI or not, they do not fit our quality standards and have little chance of getting approved in the modqueue.
The fact that my work does not fit your standards is okay. I'm only bothered by empty accusations in my direction. And also when all the works that I uploaded here were marked "made in AI". The fact that the different quality in the works is explained by the fact that somewhere I was too lazy and I just did it hastily. Like with this girl's pose.
The fact that my work does not fit your standards is okay. I'm only bothered by empty accusations in my direction. And also when all the works that I uploaded here were marked "made in AI". The fact that the different quality in the works is explained by the fact that somewhere I was too lazy and I just did it hastily. Like with this girl's pose.
So your 'new standards' for uploading your works is 'posting the ones you did lazily and hastily'? Then don't post them in the first place.
