Rather than disbelieving you, I think people were simply confused. If someone didn’t read your comment on the parent post, they completely missed out on how it’s a historically accurate garment, see-through clothes and all. When they read your more recent comment about the uncensored version being more historically accurate, they’d have no idea what you were referring to.
For what it’s worth, I upvoted you, both on your comments here and on the parent post. I appreciated the context, and learned something completely new. So, thank you.
