OK, what looks AI-generated about this? You can't just make the accusation and expect everyone to be able to tell what the anomalies that allegedly tipped you off are, especially since the variety of digital tools available to artists and the increasing sophistication of gen-AI has blurred the already fuzzy boundaries between human-made and AI-made.

MarqFJA87 said:

OK, what looks AI-generated about this? You can't just make the accusation and expect everyone to be able to tell what the anomalies that allegedly tipped you off are, especially since the variety of digital tools available to artists and the increasing sophistication of gen-AI has blurred the already fuzzy boundaries between human-made and AI-made.

Not the flagger but I agree that the images by this creator are likely ai-assisted if not fully generated. Note the weird teeth and especially the weird design on the shirt collar. Nimi's real shirt collar is a symmetrical lace-like design.

wispydreamer said:

Not the flagger but I agree that the images by this creator are likely ai-assisted if not fully generated. Note the weird teeth and especially the weird design on the shirt collar. Nimi's real shirt collar is a symmetrical lace-like design.

In addition, the shadow of the hair is also pretty messed up.

MarqFJA87 said:

OK, what looks AI-generated about this? You can't just make the accusation and expect everyone to be able to tell what the anomalies that allegedly tipped you off are, especially since the variety of digital tools available to artists and the increasing sophistication of gen-AI has blurred the already fuzzy boundaries between human-made and AI-made.

Looking through the Twitter, yeah I’m pretty sure they use AI. Never posted art until recently even though their account is from 2017. All the art of their oc are 100% fully rendered with no rough sketches. All in the exact same style with no deviation. The only “sketch” on their Twitter of fauna looks 100% AI and is literally in a different art style. All of this with how each image looks to have AI inconsistencies within the finer details. All in all, I can say, yes this whole portfolio is prolly genned.

Gah. If that's true, it's quite disappointing that they are hiding that fact. And it concerns me that I didn't notice at all; up until now, I've always had a gut feeling when seeing even highly convincing gen-AI that led me to eventually notice minor flaws, and it even led to me getting false positives a few times. I guess it was only a matter of time before I ran across something that fools even me.

MarqFJA87 said:

Gah. If that's true, it's quite disappointing that they are hiding that fact.

Given how small that account was, how the tags weren't added, and how menhera that person seems to be, AI or not those pictures weren't supposed to get all the attention, just twitter algorithm unearthing it.

[deleted]