Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? omiya (louise-louis-lucille) 145

Copyright

  • ? touhou 947k

Character

  • ? kawashiro nitori 17k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? ass 651k
  • ? back 102k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? boots 562k
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? fat 14k
  • ? hair bobbles 59k
  • ? hair ornament 1.6M
  • ? hat 1.3M
  • ? large breasts 1.8M
  • ? looking back 306k
  • ? nude 550k
  • ? sideboob 130k
  • ? sitting 1.1M
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? thighhighs 1.3M
  • ? two side up 197k
  • ? wariza 91k
  • ? white thighhighs 273k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M
  • ? highres 6.1M

Information

  • ID: 971337
  • Uploader: Saegrimr »
  • Date: almost 14 years ago
  • Approver: Not One Of Us »
  • Size: 618 KB .jpg (1100x1350) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/16251764 »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 0
  • Favorites: 29
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (almost 4 years ago)
Resized to 77% of original (view original)
kawashiro nitori (touhou) drawn by omiya_(louise-louis-lucille)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • つめがりがり

    体型は… に「うっさいなーもーっ!」   29日なので!NIKU!(6・∀・)9゛NIKU!   【追記】エロラン70位でしたァン!皆様ありがとうございますたーっ!!

    • ‹ prev Search: user:Saegrimr status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    clever name here
    over 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    if someone could provide me with a valid reason for this images's removal from the artistic nude pool, this will be my last time re-adding it. I just don't understand how it doesn't fit the rules of the pool.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Co250
    over 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    "Artistic nude"

    so I have 2 options for you

    1. you are trolling
    2. you have bad taste, really bad taste I say

    choose one

    P.S: im not the one removing this pic from the pool

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    clever name here
    over 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    "For posts with nudity that are not meant to be erotic, but show the beauty of the human body. Expect a lot of questionable rated art."

    it would seem that it's not meant to be erotic. It's also an attempt to show the beauty of the human body.

    trolling? no
    bad taste?... ok, maybe. but pardon me for seeing the beauty in this image

    but to each his own and all that noise

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Co250
    over 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    ok, Im not good at describing stuff but I will try.
    The problem is, she looks kinda fat, the coloring is way too... simple, "casual". the pose itself isnt bad, but seeing only her back wont show much things. And I dont find chubby girl "beautiful", possibly thats your personal taste.

    maybe I will bump this and see how other people comment on it. But i agree with anyone who removing this from the pool

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Dr Fine Rolo
    over 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    The chubbiness from her legs and butt is like an 17th century nude or whatever, so I can see the artistic there. but then her... love handles? Just look like an error, or that she is super fat. Then yeah, the coloring isn't really detailed enough to be 'artistic'

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    BakaHoushi
    over 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    While posters are entitled to their opinions on whether a piece is of good quality/tasteful/etc. I'd say that whether a piece is an "artful nude" or not should be at least a little more objective.

    In this case, I'd say that since it really seems to lack any sort of obvious attempts to make this nudity "erotic," I'd say it's artistic. Of course, I could also see why some people could find it erotic, but that's a whole other can of worms.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Co250
    over 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    so Dr Fine Rolo and I agree that this one shouldn't be a part of the pool, while clever name here and BakaHoushi disagree with us

    bump for more votes

    and please do it fast, i hate being serious about things around me...

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 11314
    over 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Leave it in.
    I don't like it, but it has generated enough debate to be declared artistically valid.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    clever name here
    over 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Samus86, please just let it go

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    titaniachkt
    over 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    It's been re-added,since it supposedly fits the pool's criteria of:

    For posts with nudity
    that are not meant to be erotic,
    but show the beauty of the human body.

    The last 2 are quite subjective,but that's no reason to remove it either,unless the pool's creator thinks so too

    If anyone disagrees (as seen from the edit history),you can discuss it on the forums

    (Please note that I neither like nor dislike the picture;it's a public pool after all)

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /