Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? stanley lau 640

Copyright

  • ? who framed roger rabbit 196

Character

  • ? jessica rabbit 192

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? armpits 267k
  • ? bare shoulders 1.1M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? cleavage 1.1M
  • ? dress 1.5M
  • ? earrings 649k
  • ? elbow gloves 334k
  • ? eyeshadow 56k
  • ? gloves 1.5M
  • ? green eyes 948k
  • ? hair over one eye 279k
  • ? jewelry 1.2M
  • ? large breasts 1.8M
  • ? lipstick 62k
  • ? long hair 4.9M
  • ? makeup 144k
  • ? narrow waist 12k
  • ? red hair 589k
  • ? red lips 29k
  • ? side slit 47k
  • ? sideboob 129k
  • ? solo 5.5M

Meta

  • ? commentary 1.7M
  • ? english commentary 578k
  • ? photoshop (medium) 707k

Information

  • ID: 977304
  • Uploader: fallen angel »
  • Date: almost 14 years ago
  • Approver: TheodoricBlood »
  • Size: 257 KB .jpg (692x1000) »
  • Source: deviantart.com/artgerm/art/Jessica-Rabbit-253377448 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 13
  • Favorites: 33
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Still off-topic (over 13 years ago)
jessica rabbit (who framed roger rabbit) drawn by stanley_lau

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • Jessica Rabbit

    This is a premium art print I created for Sideshow Collectibles, for their amazing Jessica Rabbit statue. You can pre-order it now here: [link]

    Cheers and more to come!

    • ‹ prev Search: user:fallen_angel status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Snafu01
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    She's not bad, she's just drawn that way...

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    EXmaster
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    this is a stylistic choise. this char takes after a more cartooning style any way soooo...

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    xitel
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    EXmaster said:
    this is a stylistic choise. this char takes after a more cartooning style any way soooo...

    Well, seeing as how she WAS a cartoon... But yes, these proportions aren't accurate to reality, but they are accurate to the character's depiction of the source material.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    hungkok2007
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    I cannot @#$%&* believe this was flagged for deletion. It's taking me a fair amount of strength to refrain from hurling invectives via keyboard.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    10half
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    hungkok2007 said:
    ...hurling invectives via keyboard.

    No trolling intended, but I'd love to see that.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    hungkok2007
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    Yeah, me too.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    dpsiko
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    hungkok2007 said:
    I cannot @#$%&* believe this was flagged for deletion. It's taking me a fair amount of strength to refrain from hurling invectives via keyboard.

    Unless I'm mistaken, western copyrights done in a western style don't fly around here typically due to reason of "Off Topic", regardless of their actual quality.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Heparine
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    The proportions are borderline grotesque, it's off topic and I personally have a hard time finding the redeeming quality (unless having a boob with three times the diameter of your waist counts as a redeeming quality). But yeah, heavens forbid somebody offends Hungkok by flagging a pic for a legitimate reason, that would be an outrage.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    hungkok2007
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    Double standard. Yawn.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 76685
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    Heparine said:
    The proportions are borderline grotesque, it's off topic and I personally have a hard time finding the redeeming quality (unless having a boob with three times the diameter of your waist counts as a redeeming quality). But yeah, heavens forbid somebody offends Hungkok by flagging a pic for a legitimate reason, that would be an outrage.

    You never saw the movie did you, she basicly looks just like this except for the shading.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    hungkok2007
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    Heparine said:
    But yeah, heavens forbid somebody offends Hungkok by flagging a pic for a legitimate reason, that would be an outrage.

    God forbid anyone question the legitimacy of a reason, or the wisdom of Heparine; that would be an outrage.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Heparine
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    DHP said:
    You never saw the movie did you, she basicly looks just like this except for the shading.

    Does it change the fact it's off-topic styled off-topic?

    hungkok2007 said:
    God forbid anyone question the legitimacy of a reason, or the wisdom of Heparine; that would be an outrage.

    Whee. A witty comeback without addressing the point at all.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    hungkok2007
    almost 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    Heparine said:
    Whee. A witty comeback without addressing the point at all.

    Be at least somewhat useful, e.g. state where to address the point where it will get proper attention. That is, if you discount the image's eventual approval as having gotten proper attention.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /