BUR #20378 has been rejected.
create implication nipple_chain -> linked_piercing
All nipple chains are linked piercings.
Posted under Tags
BUR #20378 has been rejected.
create implication nipple_chain -> linked_piercing
All nipple chains are linked piercings.
nipple_chain nipple_clamps has a few dozen posts and most seem to be properly tagged nipple_clamps.
Either nipple_chain shouldn't specifically mention piercings in its wiki (which would invalidate this BUR), or these posts need to be given a new tag called something like nipple_clamp_chain.
Not directly related but linked_piercing also needs some cleaning up in regards to piercings connected to things that aren't piercings (usually collars or gags, e.g. post #6563231), which don't fit its current wiki definition... that or, again, the wiki should be changed.
Updated by 7HS
What about nipple chains which aren't linked piercings, such as post #3853612 or post #5994283 ?
7HS said:
nipple_chain nipple_clamps has a few dozen posts and most seem to be properly tagged nipple_clamps.
Either nipple_chain shouldn't specifically mention piercings in its wiki (which would invalidate this BUR), or these posts need to be given a new tag called something like nipple_clamp_chain.
Nice catch! Looking at the wiki for nipple_chain it has been around virtually unchanged since 2009. I bet there are a lot more examples of connected nipple clamps that haven't been tagged because they technically don't qualify. I think there are arguments for either option. Incorporating nipple_clamp_chains into nipple_chain would require users to refine their search with either nipple_piercing or nipple_clamps. Taggers would also need to be informed of the change.
Not directly related but linked_piercing also needs some cleaning up in regards to piercings connected to things that aren't piercings (usually collars or gags, e.g. post #6563231), which don't fit its current wiki definition... that or, again, the wiki should be changed.
I think that post should count. You can argue that taking off the gag would leave it dangling, essentially leaving you with a nipple chain, just with a gag in the middle. (I.e. the piercings are still linked.) Third option is to create some sort of additional tag. Also notice the intricate way clitoris chains are often linked.
heartattack said:
What about nipple chains which aren't linked piercings, such as post #3853612 or post #5994283 ?
I don't think they belong in the same category as nipple chain or e.g. post #6692479. I found another example that resembles your examples and also has an additional layer of bondage: post #5670090. (Also incidentally the clitoris_piercing from the other example post #6563231, which feels similar.)
Maybe reason for an additional tag, which includes nipple chain, that is just any piercing with a chain attached to it?
Updated by Jackbob24
I personally think nipple_chain should be made more expansive rather than any new tags created. As I see it, the average person searching for them isn't likely to care precisely what they're attached to.
Jackbob24 makes a good point about linked_piercing and I withdraw that complaint.
The bulk update request #20378 (forum #256499) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.